06 Nissan Altima 3.5 vs Mustang GT

2006 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE - Intake, Exhaust - 15.725 (I know they run 14s at sea level this is at 5800 ft)

vs

New Generation Mustang GT

At Bandimere in Morrison, CO - 5800 FT Elevation

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• 06
• Nissan
• Altima
• 3.5
• Mustang
• GT
• Bandimere
• Drag
• Race

[reny213]

first of all stangs are trash. n second no way yo car gana hit 14s with just exhaust n intake. i dont car if u race on the moon no way

[L337V13T]

Stangs aren't trash. They run 14s at sea level. And that last car doesn't even make sense.

[msazone]

Who won? 15.333 won right?

[L337V13T]

Technically the Stang won. I beat him to the lines though, redlit a little bit, he was sleeping at the tree.

[exBMRguy]

Mustangs are junk, pure garbage. Poor interior, 1972 suspension.

[xJTF2x]

@exBMRguy

They aren't junk?? They're fun as all hell, get over yourself and appreciate it for what it is.

[Stupid4TV]

@reny213 come on man ur comparing altimas. watch in a couple of years altima will die and mustang will still be the legend it is. some automatic altimas might beat sucky mustang stick drivers. Me I dont even waste gas racing these peace of shit cars. always driving by me with their fart can sounding exhaust. get the fuck outta here

[jmcle884]

@Naturalhit Ok, but the point is if you took your 07 to the Bandimere track you won't be running those times, no matter how good a driver you are due to the altitude which in turn causes a loss of power. Yes the driver could still do better since the time corrected to sea level was 14.19.

[Naturalhit]

@jmcle884 My stock 07 convert. ran 13.8 at best but would average 14.0, but ofcourse that's at Calif. fall weather and at around 2800 ft sl. I think. Ofcourse, that's not something to brag about.

[jmcle884]

@Naturalhit Ok so how much faster should the GT be running then? 

[Naturalhit]

@jmcle884 Listen, it doesn't matter what their times are or what sea level it is. But that GT should've ran faster. Like I'm saying this driver is horrible.

Tell you what, I'm going to be at Fontana this April. If you're in the area bring your Altima.

[jmcle884]

@Naturalhit OMG. Let me break down into terms your little brain might comprehend. THIS IS AT 5800 FT, NOT SEA LEVEL. 15.3 corrected to sea level is 14.19, well within the 13.8-14.2 range you quoted. So in other words, this mustang ran 14.19. You lose about 3.5% of your power per 1000 feet above sea level and about 0.2-0.3 per 1000 feet on the 1/4 mile time. So 5800 feet above sea level will take about 1.0-1.5 seconds off sea level posted times. Hopefully you understand, if not you fail at life.

[Naturalhit]

@jmcle884 You're IQ is low to start with. It's all in the driver. That GT has a poor driver. I've been to a lot of track and I've seen C6 drivers due 14.5 when that car is a very low 13 and high 12.

[jmcle884]

@Naturalhit Hey retard, if you read the description you would see this is at Bandimere which is 5800 ft above sea level. The times you quoted are for sea level. My IQ just dropped having to write this to you.

[Naturalhit]

That's not a GT. A stock GT would run 14.2 to 13.8. A stock V6 runs from 15.3 to 14.8.

So that's a V6.