Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Kevin Ryan interview 1/6 - Active Thermitic Material Discovered in dust from WTC - 6th April 2009.

Kevin is a chemist who is formerly of Underwriter Laboratories. Kevin became a 9-11 whistleblower when he was fired for writing his now infamous 2004 letter to Frank Gayle at the National Institute...  
 
Customize

More From: BudhistPanda

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
21 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,487 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (47)   Options

Loading...
blueshadow1996 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Read and re-read the paper..It is never conclusive...Only speculative..What makes it more so is soaking it in Laquer thinner..If they wanted to desolve paint they should have used acid,not thinner.I wont be the only one shooting this down,anyone who reads it.
sublimy99 (4 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
They did not use laquer thinner, they used an element found in laquer thinner, called:
Methyl ethyl ketone and it was organic.
Acid would have been too rapid and would have dissolved the whole chip.They are chemists, I think you should at least extend enough latitude to allow them methods of testing, even if you do not agree with the out come.
sublimy99 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I found it to be very conclusive. The objective was to find thermetic reactions in red and grea y chip and to find thermetic properties and to prove that separate chips, (exposed to MEK ,Methyl Ethyl Ketone, which was organic) didn't have the same reactive properties of paint and the paper, clearly, concludes both. How is that not conclusive?
BudhistPanda (4 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
You might not get an answer on that one. Blueshadow 1996 was one of the last debunkers I tried to reason with. I spend 4 days trying to convince him, it did not help, and now he is blocked. They same is going to happen to all the other debunkers that try to put disinfo on my channel.

Thanks for the comment though.
nehorlavazapalka (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
haha, what?
blueshadow1996 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Your going to have to get your scales correct or you r going top fail..I already succeeded in life.
gtg309v (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
0.1 nano-meters means that one nano-meter isn't the size of an atom. One nano-meter is about the size of 10 atoms. In the case of hydrogen, one nano-meter is about the size of 27 atoms. Would it be close enough to say a 1 story building collapsed when in fact it was a 27 story building? Or what if I said a 4 story building collapsed, but it was really a 40 story building? It's no wonder you people try to compare the collapse of a 4 story toy factory to WTC7, you can't grasp numbers.
blueshadow1996 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Us people?..I called and warned them from up here and I explained why and how and what to do on that day and I was correct..That is why it is a mystery to some and not for others,they havent told you yet..I work with steel ,I know what happens and what little heat it takes weaken steel..I'll place a pice of steel that was not tempered and watch how easily it breaks becaue the atomic stturcture was re-arranged due to the heat from the weld..It broke the same place where the towers collapsed.
blueshadow1996 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I just re-read your post. 0.1 is 100 pm,they are only up to one hundred b4 it bcomes another unit.
gtg309v (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
iron oxide grains less than 120 nm were measured. nanometer scale spherical particles in nanothermite are 20-120 nm. hence, nanothermite.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.