Lakers 2010 championship (Part 8 of 9)
Top Comments
All Comments (141)
-
first team to go back to back since the 3 peat with shaq and kobe. thats history
-
epic meal time music
-
i dont think lakers wouldve won without artest in this one.
-
@greendynasty32 Brilliant reply, and so true. If a team doesn't work together, they don't deserve to win.
-
@doddi1984 That's true. What is true also is that Wallace was a big part of the C;s offence and the one piece that altered the game in the C's favor before Lakers made their run.
So if you put Perkins in the equation you have to expect the Lakers to respond better from the first quarter already knowing what they had to deal with.
Plus, 1969 Lakers deserved to be Champions too. But you are not a Champ when you deserve it. You are when you are phisicaly and mentaly ready and play as a unit.
-
Guys really think about this, when do you truly think we'll see a team go back 2 back??
-
1 dislike!! nice try LeBron
-
Lakers deserved the win in Game 7. But the big question is: Would they have won if Kendral Perkins was in the team? I mean, he was the only one who could stop either Gasol & Bynum, and he was a major factor in the Celtics defense.
-
1st dislike was shaq :D
idc if we didint win 2011. its just so awesome to watch this cause were 2010 champs. 2012 ANYONE?!
americajn768 7 months ago 21
Big baby got the wrong author to write his 'STORY'
J0104J 1 month ago 4