Moon Dehoax: Apollo 11 final approach detailed.

Analysis of moon hoax " evidences " : wrong and / or nonexistent detail correlation between Apollo images and footages.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• moon
• hoax
• apollo
• 16
• nasa
• thebadastronomer
• svector
• conspiracy
• 911
• ufo
• space
• sts
• cars
• buzz
• aldrin

[ericsbraun]

There is a more simple and reasonable conspiracy theory and explaination for the "Moon Hoaxers" claims.

NASA built the props and such to transmit falsified images so that they could transmit imagery under any circumstances--circumstances being, there is someone else on the moon with us and we don't want the public to find out on TV!

[jcgmed]

@ericsbraun There is an increasing amount of hoaxies from the " movie " side hovering to the " ufo " side, if this is what you really meant, but even today there's no a concrete agreement about what from the " movie " side can be anyway useful as evidence to the " ufo " side, which I respectfully think it happens because lots of them still don't know what to look for.

[jcgmed]

@ericsbraun However, this gives an amazing curtain of mistery, but the main differences between eg , Sibrel's theory and the quindar tones theory are almost none.

Sibrel, an ex-camera man, have ignored lots of stuff about TV / FILM cameras, and the QT theory assumes the existence of a fantastic automatic video edition system available at last 60's - early 70's, when the most powerful computer at that time could barely generate monochromatic graphics for playing Tic - Tac- Toe.

Cheers.

[Weirdoler]

@cadu1995 mormonic as yours, no way !!!!

no coherence = NO HOAX.

40 years and just cheap incoherence of hoax poetry !!

Apollo missions were real, deal with it, politi-nerd !!!

[pjwarez]

Beautiful video. Of course, the hoaxers aren't going to believe any of it.

[caseyangus]

@THREESIXNINE100 I have taken the time. too much time. I believe there is evidence that 911 was an inside job. As for the moon hoax I have read nothing whatsoever that can be called proof.

[THREESIXNINE100]

@caseyangus Take some time and do even a small amout of research on your own .you will see how they got the pic. of the earth.... they fake it

[caseyangus]

@THREESIXNINE100 I dont know how this comment got a thumbs up. It makes no sense whatsoever. It reads "blah blah blah blah nasa did not go to the moon." just shows the people who believe its a hoax will not listen to reason. even when its right in front of their faces. Care to explain how they got the picture of earth?

[mcfcguvnors]

@ericsbraun funny but the real info-telemetary tapes-vanished-the apollo orbvits of the earth & times of various things-like when apollo 13 "blew up" it was 200 thousand miles from earth-yet it took arnstrong 3 days! to get there ?!?! why the huge difference if thier earth orbits +tri were the same?(tri=trans lunar injection). They all vary wildly-some took 3 days-some took just 26 hours!!!!-yet they all used the 3 stage rockets-only difference is the lem-which is retro fitted for lem on 14 up

[THREESIXNINE100]

@Tweekerhead ..Maybe this film come from the ASP and i think it did..But ask yourself this question why when the was picking up some dust why don't you see more detail. tell me why?

[Tweekerhead]

@THREESIXNINE100 How did they get that camera that close to the Moon to take that clear of a shot back in 69' ?

[THREESIXNINE100]

A truely laughable production wow... check on the count down 5200 '4200' 3000'2000'1600'1400'700'540' NOW the camera should pick up more detail of the moon......We picking up some dust ppl remember this saying .ppl take fly a plane sometime and go to new york city .you will get .little thing like these just prove it was all fake ..nasa did not go to the moon

[MrJJ2K]

This is just a video. It proves nothing. I dont understand.

Answer the questions.

they never do.