***** 16. Evolution vs. Creationism: The Age of the Earth *****
Loading...
Loading...
4:58
God Exists. Want Proof? Try This!by TheYMOC41,257 views- 1:37
But if evolution is a fact then why.......by ThatAtheistGuy2028,147 views
- 5:07
Creationism debate on CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360"by audotorg354,964 views
- 0:50
The Big Bang Theory - Evolution versus Creationism (funny)by kubush226,777 views
- 8:39
How life started - Creationism Vs Science 2011 book (with Wby thebigbossdonuk37,051 views
- 5:19
11. Evolution vs. Creationism:Evolution Essential to Educationby hoffmanallison13,640 views
- 9:51
Evolution vs. Creationism Debate (Part 1/3)by empiricist43537102,495 views
- 2:48
21. Evolution vs. Creationism: Some Beliefs in Creationism equals 50%by hoffmanallison7,556 views
- 9:38
24. Evolution vs. Creationism:Scientists Responsibility to Speakby hoffmanallison11,038 views
- 3:41
***** 3. Evolution vs. Creationism: No Controversy *****by hoffmanallison37,613 views
- 9:59
1-8 Evolution -VS- Creationism DEBATEby SKYSPLASH68,836 views
- 8:40
***** 10. Evolution vs. Creationism:History of Evolution v Creationism *****by hoffmanallison22,412 views
- 7:46
22. Evolution vs. Creationism:Abuse of Science & Democracyby hoffmanallison9,835 views
- 4:01
***** 17. Evolution vs. Creationism: Scientific Explanations & God *****by hoffmanallison17,159 views
- 1:10
Speechless - Evolution vs. Creationismby EzraHorne107,505 views
- 9:23
Evolution vs Creation : # 3 Transitional Formsby zonkas43,924 views
- 3:24
7. Evolution vs. Creationism: The Process of Scienceby hoffmanallison12,460 views
- 7:40
***** 8. Evolution vs. Creationism: Epistemology *****by hoffmanallison28,208 views
- 4:11
Proof of Creationismby KingHeathen53,447 views
- 5:58
***** 4.Evolution vs. Creationism: "Teach the Controversy" *****by hoffmanallison24,826 views
Happy Darwin Day to all those out there in U-tube land.
mtbee9 3 weeks ago
How can we possibly know how old the earth is? How can we use science to even make a educated guess at it? I dont get it.
chestveeg 3 weeks ago
Yeh, imagine that: according to Deuteronomy, god wants the hand of any wife who withdraws her husband from a fight, by grabbing him by the genitals, to be cut off. You see, "The Lord Yowie", in his wisdom thereby declares that all persons are able to never act in haste ~ able to consider all actions ~ before committing to them. So accordingly, the distraught wife must therefore stop to think: "Oh no, better not do that ~ I'll have my hand cut off!" Who wrote that putrid biblic shit?
MagenticAdam66 1 month ago
God warns (via the bible) of every thing that would offend him ~ he never missed a single trick e.g the ruling in Deuteronomy: if a woman's husband gets into a fight, and the woman withdraws her husband from the fracas by grabbing ahold of his privates, then her hand shall be cut off and no pity shall be shown to her. Now, with such a cosmic intelligence as displayed there, where does this bald-headed "scientific" git get off defying "The Great Yowie" over how the world was really created!!!
MagenticAdam66 1 month ago
@orlandofriend God made the first tree with rings, Adam fully grown, fossils in the rocks and star light already on the way....or not.
gregrutz 1 month ago
If God created Adam on the sixth day and there were trees and such any reasonable scientist would say that Adam was a grown male and a few decades old. They would cut a grown tree and see there were many rings and they would count the years to determine the age. But if you believe that God created all things then you would know that Adam and the trees were just a day old.
orlandofriend 1 month ago
@Dporebski20 " a global flood? Is it not plain to see?"
Definitely no. You are correct in how fossils usually form - in sediments of lakes or rivers where animals can be covered quickly and protected from erosion, decay and scavenging. However this has happened continuously over 500 MY and not in one single occurrence.
There is also no geological evidence for a single flood event and nothing from 6000 years ago.
mtbee9 2 months ago
@Dporebski20 "proof of its occurrence?" I am not an astrophysicist and have not researched the evidence for the heavy bombardment but I think it is based on the knowledge of how solar systems form and the 'debris' that is around the sun that forms the planets. This would leave many objects that would collide with the planets and this would decrease over time as they are used up. Look up Heavy bombardment.
mtbee9 2 months ago
@mtbee9 And I'm just curious. Why couldn't all of the millions of fossils of dead organisms laid down in fossil graveyards be considered as evidence of a flood? Fossils don't just form anywhere and for any reason. There has to be specific conditions for a fossil to form and most of the best preserved fossils that we have are of organisms buried by sediment in moving water. Why isn't this given consideration as potential "evidence" for a global flood? Is it not plain to see?
Dporebski20 2 months ago
@mtbee9 Obviously the earth didn't always have large mountains. It's been shifting about for a while now and Mt. Everest may not have existed according to Creationist's ideas. The talk about comets is nice and all and it makes sense but where is the evidence that a "heavy bombardment" occurred? U said "it is thought" to have occurred. Was it just thought because it makes sense or is there actual empirical proof of its occurrence? I'm just trying to learn here, not supporting any particular idea.
Dporebski20 2 months ago