Mercedes CLK 55 AMG
Uploader Comments (PaLa4a)
Top Comments
-
AMG RULES!!!!!!!!!
-
////AMG POWER
All Comments (58)
-
Nice
I'm interesting by this car but how is the L/100km consumption in normal driving please ?
-
@jctevere I bought that car in 2003 ;) I sell it 2006 ;)
-
it haves 476hp not 367hp because the 367hp limits on 280 and this one goes to 320
-
@gavquinn Yes, I definitely agree with that. I was sad to see the production on the CLK stop... It was certainly a unique looking car with the pillarless window design. I hope the new c-class coupe c63 ///AMG will be a performance monger for hopefully a competitive price point.
-
@jctevere That I'll second, it is pricey. But I enjoyed driving mine so much that I still miss it with more powerful, "better" cars here now. The power isn't lots by today's standards, fine, but 367bhp will always be 367bhp. People tend to forget that's still a lot. And it always felt way more muscular to me, it felt more powerful. And that power meant that you could use it around the mountains. It slides easily, but the power meant it was controlled easily, GREAT sound. Just a great, great car.
-
AMG = Atemberaubende Muskulöse Geschosse! ;)
-
amg=omg
-
@krazykingkoke Furthermore, all I was trying to convey was how unsatisfied I was with the CLK 55's performance for its price tag, or better put, its value. I know its not all about speed and performance, but what infiniti offers for a mere $35k is a great performance and luxurious ride (great value). Dump into it with modifications upgrades the difference between this and an ///AMG and you have one badass ride. Not saying its better, just pointing out the value of the car.
Guys I have CL65 AMG
PaLa4a 3 months ago
It wasnt't fast thats why i put kompressor Kleemann :)
PaLa4a 3 months ago