WTC 7 - Pull It By Larry Silverstein

Those who question the official epxlanation of the 9/11 2001 attacks cling to this one issue. The owner of the World Trade Centers (the three that collapsed) said in an interview that he and the FDNY decided to PULL the building. The debate rages about the term and whether it has anything to do with the controlled demolition industry.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• world
• trade
• center
• wtc
• 9/11
• 9/11/2001
• september
• 11
• bombs
• explosions
• controlled
• demolition
• conspiracy
• larry
• silverstein

[OffAurora]

If Larry truly meant "pull it" as in, he told the fire chief to pull his men out (fact: they evacuated wtc7 by 11:00 a.m.) why would the chief need larry's permission to evacuate the building if it was in danger of collapsing due to "fire"?

[ThrashTillDeath73]

@Tomaji69 You may not do meds, but you definately do drugs. Here's what you don't understand in all of this. You don't understand the nature of the construction of the Towers. No building has ever been constructed like that before, and I believe none as ever been since. The simple matter is that your brain is denying what was an "unbelievable" event. All this nonsense about "inside job" and "controlled demolition" is just that...nonsense.

[BaldurdashWoW]

@ThrashTillDeath73 He has lost it, as well as all of the other people who believe that terrorists did not do it! You can see the towers fell at the impact zones, and they refuse to accept that! I have been arguing with these little kiddies for quite some time now, and it is old news!

[ThrashTillDeath73]

@Tomaji69 OMG, fella...thinking???? Is that what you call what you're doing? That's outright paranoid schizophrenic delusion. Why would a plane need to crash into WTC 7? Al Qaeda already got what they came back for ('93), they took our Towers 1 & 2. But of course, you think the "evil US government" conducted these attacks. Fella, judging by your profile pic, I'm guess you're an old Hippy. And you can't fathom an International force being able to conduct such an attack.

[BaldurdashWoW]

@Tomaji69 WOW, that is the dumbest thing I have ever read! Clearly from multiple angles you can see a gaping hole on fire, and you can see the towers collapsing from those points. You guys are helpless! watch?v=gJbGm7GE1tA&list=PL9E9­5D6E21B89899D&index=19&feature­=plpp_video

[Tomaji69]

@BaldurdashWoW - Don't do "meds", but I see you're drinking the cool-aide. The skin & structures of jets is far LESS dense than a bullet...it would scare most passengers to know just how flimsy an airplane is. The plane basically disintegrated as it impacted the structure, shredding as it passed through, leaving the black plume of quick-burning jet fuel. Gone. No damage to ANY of the steel or building structure below it.

[BaldurdashWoW]

@Tomaji69 Ah, changing the subject huh? And yet thousands of people saw planes smack into the towers, and 14 people were inside one of the towers and did not report any bombs going off, but they noticed the pancake happening inside the towers. Funny how they tell of it, the scientists tell of it, yet simple people like you do not believe it? Hmm, other buildings never did it, so they did not! Slippery slope argument anyone?

[Tomaji69]

@BaldurdashWoW - The Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy has no steel infrastructure...it was just a reinforced CONCRETE structure. Using "re-bar" in the concrete - it's all basically a "stacked" structure. If it had a steel grid infrastructure, like the WTC (which had TWO massive steel grids), those steel grids would still remain in a top-down collapse.

[BaldurdashWoW]

@Tomaji69 OK, if you say so! But before I leave you to your daily meds, please do tell us what effect a several ton jet going at 500+ miles an hour has on a standing building? I mean, a bullet has less weight than a steel, yet when velocity is added, the bullet can penetrate and sometimes shatter said steel! Also, if there were bombs, how did the planes not set them off on impact?

[Tomaji69]

@BaldurdashWoW - The steel infrastructure inside the towers would be ZERO damaged from the jets, just glass & facade. The planes were shredded, because they are made of paper compared with the mass of the steel. The jet fuel burns quickly, then gone, like lighter fluid...yes, it ignited fires, so what? Research shows that tall steel structures DO NOT collapse due to fires. You mention "floor" collapse. Maybe a few "floors" could crumble - but NONE of the STEEL would collapse.