ARMSTRONG GUILT 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
39,389
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 16, 2009

For full info about this video go to:-

www.apollovideos.bravehost.com

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 52 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (APOLLOREALITY)

  • Sibrel is a tosser who is only looking to get his fame a few bucks. They went to the moon. Live with it and get on with your life. Having stupid vids like this PROVES to me that you theorists constantly clutch at straws and you have nothing better to do. All of your arguments can be proved wrong....the LRO has photographed the landing sites (were they faked as well). The only way you'd believe it is if your asses were shot up up there so u could see the footprints yourself.

  • @dave46563 They did not go anywhere near the Moon. Live with it and get on with your life. If you continue to believe in fantasy, then expect people to take the piss out of you.

  • To any knuckle dragging fucktards who don't believe we went to the moon just point a fucking laser at the mirror left on the surface you pond life scum

  • @Rockster969 Why don't you do some research for once in a while. Being a knuckle dragging fucktard who didn't believe it at the time, I have had over 40 years in which to research the fakery.

    How many years have you been doing research into the fake Apollo Moon missions? Very little by the looks of it. You may wish to look at the APOLLO FACTS page, and that will answer your stupid question about a laser mirror on the Moon, because basically there ain't any laser mirrors on the Moon.

Top Comments

  • Even if I had not studied all the evidence of fake photos and the rest of the smoking guns that clearly show that the moon landings were a hoax, I would be certain that they didn't go simply by the reactions of those astronauts when Bart Sibrel cornered them.

    Innocent people who are telling the truth simply don't behave as most of them did. Eugene Cernan came across pretty well, I must admit, and he even sounded believable. But all the others blew it.

    They never went, and Sibrel proved it.

see all

All Comments (364)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Moon walks all faked! Radiation too strong and USA would never risk getting the asstronuts fried like the Hiroshima radiation burned victims. Also, there are lots of irrefutable pieces of evidence that prove all moon landings were faked. For example:

    Go to this site and study it well.

    andrewlongman(dot)com/?tag=moo­n-problems

  • @mkp823

    Admittedly it is not strict scientific proof, but as there is no other plausible explanation for the way all but one of those astronauts reacted to Sibrel, I believe they put the matter beyond a reasonable doubt.

    All I see from your side is claims that swearing on a Bible is meaningless. But it wasn’t just the Bible they were running away from. Look at the terror on the face of Michael Collins and the panic that came over John Young.

    They didn't go to the moon. Live with it.

  • @BritishTruthSeeker If that is your definition of "proof", then you are indeed a damned idiot.

  • @TheDeJureTour -- As far as the "no fly zone" is concerned, the thought that you don't want to distrub the first human footsteps and leave them for posterity is cool, I guess. But I think they ought to have one of the 6 sites that's fair game.

    In the long run, it doesn't really matter. You can see them from orbit anyway. Not as clearly with a mapping probe. But you can't stop a higher resolution camera from flying over.

  • @TheDeJureTour -- So without a Saturn V rocket (or equvalent) in production, you don't lift anything very large all the way to the moon.

    And if you're not going all the way to the moon, then you're doing stuff in earth orbit (usually for extended periods of time, like months at a time instead of a couple hours) so, (1) there's no advantage to a higher orbit and (2) for that length of time, you want to avoid the Van Allen belts.

  • @TheDeJureTour, And in the same 40 years, not much else has changed in aerospace. Boeing just now launched their first all-composite airliner (wow! [sarcasm]. It's 5 years behind schedule and it's wings still bend too much.)

    1968, Boeing built the 747. Still building same 747.

    1964: The U.S. SR-71. No longer flying.

    1969: The British/French Concorde. No longer flying.

    In 1957, U.S. first launched the Atlas orbital booster. Still using same booster with slight upgrade in motor plumbing.

  • @TheDeJureTour -- Look up the Soviet N1 rocket. It was just about a powerful as the Saturn V. It was intended to carry Soviets to the moon.

    4 flight tests. 4 explosions upon launch.

    It had a fundamental flaw that created too much vibration in the several dozen motors that they tried to use (instead of the 5 large motors on the Saturn V)

  • @prosperomage Well, the sad but true facts are that other than the 24 Americans that went to the Moon (for the Apollo believers), no human being has been out from Earth more than 400 miles in 40 years.

    That's just plain astounding. I still don't understand why the Russians didn't send at least a Cosmonaut or two around the Moon and back.

    It's been 40 flippin' years! That's more time than transpired between the Wright brothers first flight and the first flight of a jet aircraft.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more