The sequence of events here is interesting.
Two robbers enter a liquor store. One robber pulls out a gun and shoots at the store clerk, the clerk has a gun of his own and he shoots back. The robber who didn't have a gun gets hit and dies shortly after.
The person who gets charged with the robber's death is actually the other robber who fired at the clerk. Watch the video and see why.
I've come across these types of cases in the past and it always intrigues me how the law sometimes establishes legal accountability particularly in other, more complex, cases.
I agree with the court's decision in this particular case, do you?
Link to this comment:
All Comments (3,507)