Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Phoenix 9-11 Truth confronts Channel 12 News

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,246
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 13, 2008

Street action in front of Channel 12 News in Phoenix Arizona in response to their non coverage of the 9/11 hunger strike at John McCain's office. As expected, no one came out for an interview, but we let them know that we know that they are neglecting to do their job.

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Hi there!!! Youtube search Silverstein...and the INSURANCE policy taken out...and why did building seven collapse..it must have been those vibrations right.

    We know the truth and it will be exposed.

    THE MEDIA is controlled by a select FEW.

    Your local news beats you down everyday..its' no different then putting your brain in a washing machine... rape murder, toddlers dying, pregnant women stabbed...EVERY SINGLE DAY..making you weak and fearfull.

    Those that DO NOT QUESTION=children

  • Sane people ran the concentration camps. Hole in the Pentagon too small with no wing entry points. No plane parts found in Penn. WTC 7 not even hit and came down. WTC did not fall or burn, they exploded as evidenced by the fine dust. The sounds of explosions heard by witnesses & recorded on 9/11 calls at the end. Military on stand down. Lies to New Yorkers & others about air safety. War as a response to crime, with the wrong countries. Who benefitted most from 9/11?

    9/11 was an inside job.

see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Channel 3, 5, 10, 12 and 15 news people suck. The reporters are soo stupid. Lin sue coney got rid of Kent Dana so she could be the senior reporter. Lin sue is married to the CEO of channel 12. She blows him so she could get promoted. Channel 10 sucks their morning crew bunch of air headed blondes that don't know where Canada is on the map. Arizona local news sucks.

  • Figured could not handle the math. Where was there any evidence of liquefied steel? Making stuff up now are we.

  • If you are stupid enough to think that drywall could form a reaction capable of LIQUEFYING STEEL then we are done here.

    Good night, go back to sleep and pretend that everything is OK.

  • No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified"

    Wallboard idiot.

    Nope FEMA did not tell them to investigate, they suggested NIST did and no supporting evidence was found.

    As is detailed in NIST 2005, Blanchard and Bazant.

    Still Jones has no answer.

    No FreeFall, Bazant, and do not answer unless

    you can disprove the math.

    And, MOLTEN METAL is not indicative of Demolition.

  • YES THEY DID IGNORE IT, THERE IS NO MENTION OF IT ANYHWERE IN ANY OF THOSE SOURCES!!!

    Wallboard? That's so ridiculous - you think office fire + wallboard = severe corrosive eutectic reaction?

    Steven Jones never said he had no evidence, I have seen him present lots of evidence, and by the way I never brought him up!

    NIST should at the very least INVESTIGATE WHAT ANOTHER GOVT AGENCY TOLD THEM TO INVESTIGATE!!!!!

    AND WHAT ABOUT THE FREEFALL!?!

  • No they did not ignore them, Wallboard idiot, look it up. Read the papers, they explain it all. You have no evidence. Stephen Jones admits he has no evidence, should they investigate Nukes because some nut says so? Or Particle beam Weapons? No you can only investigate as far as the evidence leads.

  • No evidence of melted steel?

    FEMA Appendix C: "Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfication with subsequent intragranular melting"

    "No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified"

    "More study... is needed"

    Bazant, Blanchard, NIST, etc. ALL IGNORED THIS EVIDENCE!!

    NFPA guidelines say to test for the residue of an accelerant if melted steel is found!

    Sorry if you don't like it, but it's a cover up!!

  • You did not read Bazant did you, for shame, and apparently you did not read Blanchard.

    There is zero evidence for thermite, If you had bothered to read the entire FEMA report and the NIST response and Bazant you would understand that. Thermite is no exotic, as your paper points out it is made of comment materials which would have been expected to be present at the levels found at the WTC.

    Also no evidence of melted steel has ever been produced.

  • "Stephen Jones admits that questions as to the viability of his theory remain unknown" Exactly, there has yet to be an real investigation!

    the Blanchard paper DOES NOT talk about FEMA Appendix C!

    NIST DOES NOT talk about FEMA Appendix C!

    Due to the evidence of liquefied steel in the FEMA report, NIST was obligated (NFPA guidelines) to test for the residue of an exotic accelerant (such as thermate) and they refused!

    WTC7 was in freefall for more than 2 seconds!

    NIST covered up the demolition!

  • Blanchard impolsionworld

    In Blanchard, Stephen Jones admits that questions as to the viability of his theory remain unknown...

    Jones needs to come up with a viable theory, and Blanchard does answer FIMA. However your

    paper cited; is unpublished and RE JONES?

    You need to look ab Bazant also.

    Collapse of World Trade Center Towers: What Did and Did Not Cause it?

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more