"I Don't Like Gravity" - Deal With It

This clip is taken from the sermon "Trial: Temptation From Hypocrisy," preached by Pastor Mark Driscoll at the Mars Hill Church Ballard campus in Seattle, Washington, on February 08, 2009. It is the 5th sermon in our sermon series, "Trial."

To watch the full sermon, visit: http://www.marshillchurch.org/media/trial/temptation-from-hypocrisy

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• driscol
• driscoll
• hill
• Jesus
• mark
• mars
• marshill
• peter
• trial
• via-pixelpipe

[VictoriaLeigh93]

If you don't believe in it, don't bother arguing it. Christians are still going to be bold, serve the Lord, read our Bibles, and get saved. None of the cynicism and lies are going to stop us so God Bless! :-).

[StrumstickJoe]

@hornzbiddle1189 You're right, so goodbye!

I'm going to read all yours, and the others, and my posts again, so that I can try to make sense of what has been said.

I feel you haven't read mine, because there has been no real reply. Your beliefs in your statistics are ill-founded.

But, all the best, have a good life that benefits others, and then return to the stars. You will never find out there is no magic realm. ;-)

[noibn2]

@karaj555: I don't want to come off as disrespectful here but I would suggest you look into the matter a little further. Even the most rudimentary course in biology supplies plenty of proofs, which include; comparative anatomy, DNA evidence, the fossile records, geographical distribution of species in line with what one would expect if Darwin was right. In fact, it can be seen happening before your eyes in a microscope - as has been the case when observing antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

[karaj555]

@noibn2 I own an advertising company with my husband so no im not in the field. lol. In fact my mom was in the scientific field for a while and so was my sister... I don't dismiss proofs anymore than a logical person becuase it just requires me to admit there is a possibility anything I or others think is wrong. I'm not even saying evolution is totally false, but i don't see much real evidence. Its all assumptions based on assumptions one thing we do know is they will say something else in 100yr

[karaj555]

@LLThenu thank you for taking the time to reiterate what u think that really reflects very well on u :) I understand that u are frustrated with him, but if you are go listen to someone like my uncle Tim Keller. His audience is a bunch of New Yorkers so he is alot more "walking-on-egg-shells" But you have to understand who Mark is talking to. Every pastor is called to preach 1 message to a certain ppl Mark is rough, but he feels called to the hard tattooed crazy ppl who also make fun of tebow .

[noibn2]

@karaj555: The Faeroe Island house mouse. (unfortunately youtube wont let me post the link to the article, but I could mail it to you)

Would you happen to be a professional in the field? I'm curious because you seem to dismiss "most proofs" so casually. Care to refer me to a credible scientific journal or a peer-reviewed article that supports that notion? Btw, carbon dating is a method of determinating the approximate age of something, it's not really proof of evolutionary theory

[LLThenu]

@karaj555 I agree with the content of this srmon clip. If i have been sarcastic, it has been partly by the example of Mark. How many times has he not been sarcastic even to other members of the body. i.e. homeshoolers...(Tim Tebow). I guess the word is not enough to draw a crowd. you have to market it.

[karaj555]

@LLThenu lol u dont think people are bad do you.... you can just say you disagree instead of making a sarcastic statement. It reflects badly on you not him because you kinda sound a bit whiny and childish.

[karaj555]

@noibn2 show me a thing that starts as one species and becomes a totally different species and I will agree with you, but im sorry most "proof" is using methods like carbon dating that have more proof they are inacurate than acurate... btw therer are christian evolutionists that believe that god created the world and the days are not quite literal.

[noibn2]

Very good Mr.Driscoll, now move on to evolution.You don't seem to like that either but evolution exists and you have to deal with it.

[chimera667]

@Grrrrtt So there is a correct way to criticize an ancient text of historical half-truths? Who decides what is the right way to criticize it? Any way it goes the answer is going to be biased and therefore invalid. Same for context. I think that verse is completely in context. Obviously, you don't. Where is the line? Who decides its placement. You cannot correct my context without having a valid alternative and all you seem to be able to provide is your own terrible biased opinion.

[Grrrrtt]

@chimera667 if you want to criticize scripture, please do it correctly. Context Context Context.