Ricky Gervais Refused By Steve Carell

Golden Globe Awads - Moment between gervais and Carell - Awkward!

Please note - This was a STAGED Performance between Gervais & Carell - IT IS NOT REAL!!! -
Edited to look real.

• Category

  Entertainment

[ajax201000]

there is something very wrong in believing in creationism, its absurd and there is no basis for it.

[Steve Flores]

The intro is gay. The replay is gay. The ending is gay.

[David Turner]

No it's all a joke, they don't actually hate each other. Why do you think Gervais got Carell on Life's Too Short? If he was pissed off at him he wouldn't of done it would he?

[DGKblazed]

hahahaha steve carell is such a dick in real life.

[Roland Boss]

why is there a religious argument on here?

[gronkinator1]

Why thank you. I pride myself on not resorting to foul language and childish name calling when someone demonstrates how ignorant and closed-minded they are.

I explained to you that abiogenesis is a separate issue from evolution; even if we could not explain the origins of life, it would not discredit evolution in the slightest. If you were really interested in it, you would look up for yourself the current descriptions of abiogenesis and see why it is plausible and likely.

[psylande]

Wow, great use of technical language and a condescending attitude to avoid addressing my core point. Let me repeat it. "the existence of life, and the nature of its change over time, is still not fully explained by a modern science. Its just not". I know that hurts your sensibilities, but its true. And, I am familiar with Abiogenesis. Could you cite me a study that has demonstrated the creation of SUSTAINABLE LIFE, and not just strings of amino acids? And last but not least, you are a fagot.

[ezekieloak]

The problem comes when people of faith act upon those beliefs in ways that harm people and destroy the planet. That's when your claim that there's "nothing wrong" comes into question.

And regarding your claim that no one knows how we got here, I only have to say that scientists are the ones enthusiastic about not knowing and therefore doing the experimenting and the learning while people of faith, more often than not, claim to know exactly how we got here.

-And on what day of the week, too!

[mwgary]

Ricky and Steve are good friends. That wasn't real. See both their interviews on Piers Morgan.

[gronkinator1]

We can show the development of traits, speciation, and a host of other processes through repeatable experiments.

Abiogenesis is a totally separate process from evolution, but you should be pleased to know that there are sound hypothesis on that which have been developed in about the last 10 years or so. Science is making enormous progress; meanwhile, you rely on information decades old and keep appealing to the god of the gaps when you don't understand something.

[gronkinator1]

One is a set of rules created by examining a ton of evidence, and supported by all of it. The other is people intentionally misreading a book written over 2000 years ago by people with no understanding of science.

So yeah, there is something wrong with it. It's about like believing the earth is flat or the sky is a solid dome.

[arthur hawkins]

dumb ass! educate yourself - then form an opinion..