True word here.I have known it for a long time.I was actually invited to leave a church by the pastor of it,over this very issue.I did leave and with a clear conscience.
Also going back to the first rider, Jesus said "For MANY shall come in my name" Yet the interpretation in the video says the rider on the white horse is one person. So I don't see how this can be a "perfect match."
Why is the First Rider an actual person (the Antichrist), but the remaining riders are events like "wars", "famines" and "martyrs"? It does not appear to follow logically.
Additionally, the second rider is given a sword, which you just said minutes earlier was something given to Jesus. Wouldn't this rider be a possible antichrist since he has a sword? The same argument is used with respect to the white horse for the first rider and Jesus, since Jesus rides a white horse.
True word here.I have known it for a long time.I was actually invited to leave a church by the pastor of it,over this very issue.I did leave and with a clear conscience.
lifeseeker51 1 month ago
Also going back to the first rider, Jesus said "For MANY shall come in my name" Yet the interpretation in the video says the rider on the white horse is one person. So I don't see how this can be a "perfect match."
RizNJ 1 month ago
Why is the First Rider an actual person (the Antichrist), but the remaining riders are events like "wars", "famines" and "martyrs"? It does not appear to follow logically.
Additionally, the second rider is given a sword, which you just said minutes earlier was something given to Jesus. Wouldn't this rider be a possible antichrist since he has a sword? The same argument is used with respect to the white horse for the first rider and Jesus, since Jesus rides a white horse.
RizNJ 1 month ago