Obama Flip Flops on Cuban Embargo

"the war in Iraq has led to more deaths then under Saddam.."

To say something like this is to know absolutely nothing about Saddam Hussein. Look up deaths caused and wars started by Saddam and come back.

Are you saying you support a hawkish policy towards ALL dictatorships? You call us war crmininals for getting rid of Saddam Hussein, what would you call us for getting rid of King Abdullah?

I hear this argument from you people all the time: "You intervene too much, but not enough!"

By that logic, America should've never opposed Stalin after allying with him in WW2.

The idea that decisions can't be reversed and foreign policy can't be changed is illogical and unrealistic.

It's funny that you say the U.S. was wrong for supporting Saddam and yet call George W. Bush a war criminal for correcting that policy of earlier administrations. He was never guilty of supporting Saddam himself

I think your opinions stem more from a prejudiced anti-americanism than from principles.

well you needed Stalin then he was good then you did not need him and he was evil. my point exactly.

When you need dictators it's all fine when you don't they are tyrants.

Again bring people to power give them guns and so on to go nuts on everything and then want prase for removing them.

Look search for George Galloway in Seattle here on youtube he speakst abit about you supporting dictators, wheather you agree with Galloway or not it's a good speeach. and he makes sense.

lmfao, George Galloway is the biggest shill of dictators the world.

When he wasn't saluting Saddam hussein's "courage and indefatiguability" on Iraqi state tv which can be seen here on youtube, he was rabble rousing Iraqi insurgents on Syrian state tv, another baathist dictatorship.

He now works for press tv in the UK, which is owned by the Iranian government, he's their mouthpiece in the West.

If you want to find someone in favour of dictatorship, and totalitarianism Galloway's your man.

I said weather you agree with him or not it's a good speech and that's true

George Galloway will side with anyone so long as they are anti-american, that's why he sided with the Soviet Union until it fell, and then he sided with Arab dictators, particularly Saddam, but then he fell, and now he's siding with the mullahs in Tehran, and Hezbollah and Hamas.

He's just sore with dictators friendly with the U.S., whilst loving anti-us dictators.

Do you think it's a wise policy to be hawkish with all dictatorships, or should the ones hostile towards you be high priority?

look go watch the speech, ok go watch it he speaks very ill of dictators there ok, dictators in Iraq, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Uzbekistan, Nigeria, just see it ok.

lol, yes, pro-western dictators. If dictators are pro-west, Galloway hates them, if they're anti-us, lkie Fidel Castro, Ahmadinejad, Al-Assad, and others, he supports them. Look up his comments on Fidel, his comments on Iran, on Syria, and the theocratic Hezbollah militia. He hates Egypt because it made peace with Israel.

Look at where your anti-american prejudice has gotten you, looking up to and admiring a disgraced member of british parliament and a shill for state sponsors of terrorism.

your a fucking fool do you like to put words in other people's mouths eventhough they have never said anything.

Tell me where have I said that I like George Galloway I have not, so fuck you right back. Idiot