Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Randy Powell - Intro to Vortex Math - Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
14,744
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 14, 2010

Randy Powell explains vortex math and the ABHA Torus from the beginning.
Expanding on the work of Marko Rodin. Contact Randy directly at randy@theabhakingdom.com or visit his website at http://www.theabhakingdom.com

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (theabhakingdom)

  • Actually I have in depth proof of this assertion almost above any others that I have made. It's a little complex for a youtube comment box but my phone number is on my website and i will have skype set up in the next few days as i just got a computer. you are welcome to contact me anytime and I can give you the criteria.

  • doubling is based on the octave which has the other series embedded within it but this requires a lot more research. maybe you can help discover the connection. as far as the movement of the vortex there are many factors so i don't want to understate it in such a short reply.

see all

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Where does the circle of numbers 1-9 come from? It appears to come out of thin air...wheres the math for that? Cyphometry has a formula for that, but where is VBM's solution?....I can't find it anywhere...lol

  • CRITICISM

    3 - 0:15 - Not sure if the "individualizing cells" is true, but such claims can add doubt to the listener's mind. Adding such "facts" are effective as it shows how grandiose this math system is, so it may be better to warn the listener in the beginning of this lecture that all stated facts are true.

  • @TheExistingFilms Not simply in engineering, but in all branches of study.

  • @andrewyaoauatauabaea That is true, but 0 is an undefined number. It also has elements of both infinity and finiteness (which is called "bounded infinity" or "finite-infinity" and used in theoretical mathematics, particularly in physics). It's a very intriguing concept once you delve into it.

  • @Jasumi

    0 isn't imaginary bit ly/oCa4A1

  • @andrewyaoauatauabaea Pseudo-math? I learned this in high school calculus. I am no New Ager, Christian, or whomever you believe me to be--I am a student of Engineering. I suggest you research "unreal" numbers and "imaginary" numbers. I am simply using human perception as an example (the same example that was shown to myself in college) to help you understand this concept.

  • @Jasumi

    No, 0 is finite, infinity is the only non-finite number, hence it being named INfinity.

    I don't understand why I would have to count the number of atoms for it to be significant.

    I think this is the first pseudo-math I've seen.

  • @cannibalcarrot666 It's also intriguing to note, that the rules governing the behavior of zero and infinity are almost identical, as those two numbers are reflecting one another rather than assuming opposite behavior. Oh, and I'd like to clarify that is not I who has made this realization, I'm simply imparting the views of current mathematics...

  • @andrewyaoauatauabaea Yes, but if someone where to lay 100 trillion carbon atoms across a field would you be able to count all of them? It would take you an immeasurable length of time, perhaps even until death. The mathematics involved in conceptualizing numbers of that scale becoming increasingly complex as we ascend (or descend) the number timeline. Lastly, the numbers 0 and infinity are not finite numbers according to conventional mathematics, they are both considered "undefined".

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more