Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

4.3 vs 4.8 silverado

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,651
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 21, 2009

my cousin rubens 4.3 has intake, programer and exhaust vs my friends lozano with 4.8 silverado and all stock

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (nandochevy09)

  • Nativebrother@ some people drop them and some people lift them you shouldn't worry about how some one elses ride looks just worry about your own ride (if you have one)

  • Clarda1@ I'm not lying I was with the guy in the 5.9 Durango and my cousin was racing him in the 4.3 and the 4.3 pulled on him maybe the bed  but still a 4.3 wish I had taken a video for proff

  • @askloglog your just one of the haters you wish you had a truck that look like one in video

  • Yes guey

  • The 4.3 isn't that slow of a truck it would keep up with 5.9 durangos and titan and the truck that wins is a 2002 it's just strait pipe and yeah the 97 v6 gas millage and this truck blows it's not real idk numbers but it's sucks

  • yeah the one that won is the v8

see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @fast98gtp Yup the tires totally ruined it lol. I had a 2000 durango before that i could consistently get 19mpg-20mpg avg on the interstate That had superchips 3815, full exhaust, plugs, wires, throttle body spacer (not sure if that helped..) K&N Cold air intake, smaller 31x10.5 tires and taller gears!

  • @clarda1 Whoa thats a big drop. I average 22-23mpg in my silvy(half city/half highway).... glad I didnt get an 8. Is there anything you can do to the durango to get better mileage?

  • @fast98gtp Yeah I know I dont really trust any of those results as they vary so much. You should check out my Durango videos got soem 0-60, 20-80 and even a mpg one haha. I used to get 20MPG going 60mph with no hills etc, but now i have agressive tires and do mostly interstate traveling and i barley get 15-16mpg now, still get around 17 on normal highway driving. But yes, The gas on these vehicles sucks alot. I reset my mpg meter for in town driving and im averaging 8.7mpg.

  • @clarda1 what kind of mileage do you get? My friends durango is getting 15-17mpg highway at very best. He's wanting to sell it

  • @clarda1 Some of those numbers are off, especially the 4.8l truck and '05 5.3. If the '11 4.3 really is that quick then mine is quicker.. mine has a little bit of work done to it plus it's lighter by a few hundred lbs. That would put my truck quicker than some 5.9 durangos. how do you figure 7.7? .. well anyway, I know everybody's opinions and whatnot are different because of the circumstances.. whether it be mods, miles, driver, weather, well maintained or abused trucks, etc. 

  • @fast98gtp the brand new 2011 4.3L takes 8.5 seconds to 60. I cannot find reliable information on the early 4.3's and 4.8's 0-60mph but unless its as fast as the earlier 5.3;s it will not beat the 5.9L. Then again Doing the exhaust on my truck and new plugs really helped, that could also be the reason, now I pull 7.5-7.7 just with those simple mods. (plus a K&N drop in filter)

  • @fast98gtp That may be the reason, all the 5.3's and 4.8's I have raced with my 5.9L have been in the 99 silverados. I just think something is off here for both of us to have such different opinions/experiences...But just for clarification: (stock)

    1st gen Dodge Durango 5.9L 0-60MPH 8.2 seconds

    1999 Silverado 4.8L 0-60 ????????????????

    1999 Chevy Silverado 5.3L 0-60MPH 8.0 Seconds

    2000 GMC Sierra 4.8L ex cab 10.2 seconds

    2005 Silverado 5.3L Extended cab 0-60MPH 8.5 seconds

    2011 4.3L 0-60 8.5

  • @LOC60100 same here.

  • @clarda1 Another buddy of mine has an '05 regular cab 5.3 2wd with only exhaust and k&n system. It would destroy a '99 5.3...they were underpowered.

  • But there's nothing wrong with my facts. I am a gm guy but I do respect Dodges. This is my personal experience. You CAN have something with less power beat something with more power.. My truck is by no means fast, but I have raced what I've raced. At 4200 lbs, it IS lighter than a lot of things I've run against. Now when I tow something or when a 4.3 is extended cab... yeah, those are slow. Same for 4.8s unless built somewhat. I'm also not saying yours didnt beat those trucks, either.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more