BBC reports WTC 7 fell 23 minutes too soon
Top Comments
All Comments (150)
-
That the story was scripted by Rothschilds" Reuters and passed to the BBC one hour too soon is documented in the offficial response by the BBC -which is also available on youtube.
There was no incorrect or misinformed statement. The news story was the identical one passed by Reuters to all media, - except in this instance one hour too soon.
-
The live transmission was broadcast 23 minutes prior to the 'collapse", which the hewsreader says happened " some short time ago".
-Approximately 1 hour too soon.
This is confirmed not only by the live shot (WTC7 still standing) and from all sources). The press release was transmitted one hour too soon - at CET, not GMT or London studio. It was therefore in error and ignorant of BST (British summertime).
That it was clearly timed without BST indicates script was from pre-March 2001.
-
The script being read by the newsreader has been put to paper long before 9/11, as it details the full (official) reasons for "collapses" of all buildings on 9/11 by broadcasting "breaking news" (one hour too soon) about an "unexpected" event that not only is a physical impossibility (WTC7 vertical collapse from "dust") but has never happened before in the history of the planet.
Rothschilds press released too early and blew the gaff.
-
This video is irrefutable evidence that the whole of the 9/11 scenario was faked with controlled demolitions and media. It also shows that the event was planned long before 9/11 - before British summertime at the latest (March 2001), possibly much earlier by a few years.
The only thing that ever "collapsed" on 9/11 was the conspiracy theory about hijacked planes, suicidal arab terrorists, and primitive cave dwellers controlling US airspace.
The live transmission of this lie cannot be denied.
-
@snakeskin2u2 With regard to the BBC, I see you're having a hard time with my question. It's a simple question. You claim there was a script. Of course, there's no evidence of any script. But more importantly, and now I'm asking for a third time, why would the BBC reporter have needed to a script telling her to say something that she would have said anyway?
-
@snakeskin2u2 Unfortunately for the remaining 9/11 truther true believers like you, the "inside job" theories haven't moved beyond highly biased and misinformed web sites and YouTube videos which have no credibilty and accountability. They're run by some Joe Blow guy who can make up whatever claims he wants and people like you swallow it without questioning it. There are indeed problems with the media, but to claim all media in the world is controlled is silly.
-
The BBC received payment of 1billion euros for the year 2011 as a "loan" for services rendered. They have been paid annually through the EU by Beatrix/ Bilderberg group since the first payment in 2001. It is not coincidence that 9/11 was perpetrated in that same year.
There are no proper accounting records of those payments, as there have never been any repayments or interest transferred since 2001.
The BBC are merely one of many such propaganda machines operated by the banksters.
-
If you seek answers to your questions in seeking to support those who perpetuate the myth about 9/11, then you admit that you know less about 9/11 than others who have commented.
That the media is srtictly controlled throughouit is well known, except in your circles, obviously.
If you seek to enlighten others, then do not come to them with questions.
YOU too have to live in this world - (at least until you are brought to book).
I would suggest you find another job.
Listen up retards: WTC collapsed at 5:21:10 pm EDT not EST. Read that ok? 5:21:10 pm EDT is 21:21:10 GMT. This reporting happened at 21:54 therefore that is 33 minutes AFTER WTC 7 collapsed. Anyone not understanding this?
nwallis89 4 months ago 5
@Viideoloover
Yes - she is reporting live, and yes, the building has not yet fallen.
That is all confirmed many years ago.
snakeskin2u2 2 months ago 2