Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

PAD Pantamit Bangkok Suvarnabhumi Airport Peaceful Demonstration-28 Nov 2008

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,186
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 31, 2008

Proxy governments Samak-Somchai had received orders from their boss Mr. T. to modify the constitution for avoiding the dissolution of the PPP and to clear the Thaksin's corruption cases!
And the PAD was against!
During the final term of the 193 days of political protest, PAD has been more and more killed and injured every day by military weapons without police/government protection while PAD may not let this proxy government of Thaksin to continue!
These are the reasons, why PAD increased the pressure of protest to Don Muang and Savarnabhumi airports.

Don Muang is an airport with no or very little air traffic. On 24 Nov 2008 there was government cabinet meeting in this place. So, the first reason to go to this airport was to demonstrate and to pressure on the government to resign, and not for to close a no significant airport. At this time, Somchai was in Peru. He missed this meeting because his flight was delayed, due to technical problems.
On 25 Nov 2008, PAD moved to Savarnabhumi airport, for waiting Somchai, who was expected to arrive from Peru. Why Somchai could not have a welcome comity, as Thaksin had during the Samak regime, when he came back from exile?
So, where is the logic to go to Savarnabhumi, for -waiting the arrival of Somchais flight, -and to close the air traffic????
A possible explanation is that the airport manager, who is good friend (family) of Thaksin, Somchai and UDD-DAAD red shirts, decided to close the airport for to facilitate the Somchais flight to be diverted to Chiang-Mai, and so avoiding the PAD peaceful demonstration!!!!
If it was not the PAD who instructed to close the airport, then, it was probably the AIRPORT AUTHORITY who should assume the responsibility!!! And we had heard bizarrely very little from them tongue-tied. The airport authority is possibly not very clear in this story, and wanted to report every things on PAD!

PAD was demonstrating peacefully at the airports without crossing in the safety zones. Also, no degradation had been reported on the buildings by the PAD. Only broken glasses reported at Don Muang, done by a grenade lunched by pro-Thakin-Somchai red shirts side, which killed and injured PAD peaceful demonstrators.
So, saying that PAD are terrorists..., PAD are responsible of the airports closure..., are only slogans for easily brain-washable bought red-shirts pro-Thaksin!

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • very peaceful protesting and good terrorist.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more