Q&A With Bro. Eli Soriano @ Revelation TV Part 1- 4 of 6

Sorry for the quality of this video this is a test broadcast and the first 20 minutes of this episode are not recorded due to technical problem.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Debate
• Revelation TV
• The Old Path
• UNTV
• Truthcaster
• Eli Soriano
• Bible Exposition
• Q&A
• MCGI
• Ang Dating Daan
• Church Of God

[elmansays]

Surely, Bro Eli is blessed to rightly divide the word of truth.

2 Timothy 2:15 NKJV

Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

5 A lamp[a] is despised in the thought of one who is at ease;  It is made ready for those whose feet slip. Job 12 NKJV

I would believe to Bro Eli whose faith is alive.

James 2:20 NKJV

But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?

[ThePeaceshalomsalam]

Shame on Soriano, claiming to be a well-reader of the Bible, But Dravy is the one who read a thing on that Bible that he is not sure.Soriano said Nowhere In the Bible We will read If the Noah`s Flood was a local or Global, But Dr.Dravy read it for him it was Global, Poor Mister Soriano.

[ThePeaceshalomsalam]

kakahiya ang pantas Binasahan!



[Caicen]

@elmansays More trolling.

[elmansays]

Proverbs 9:8 NKJV

Do not correct a scoffer, lest he hate you; Rebuke a wise man, and he will love you.

[Caicen]

@elmansays You ADD's never run out of "cop out". When they failed to give you arguments, they always have a bail card to escape there defeat.

"but you rather comment for him here"

- Of course I would comment here, the videos are here(youtube) not in his twitter or wordpress. ADD's are a dishonest as a whole, Esorianowordpress are moderated when it is not supposed to, but the admin chose what will be post and what will be not, but his brethrens are freely to post "idiots, morons, stupid".

[Caicen]

@elmansays More details? He have the chance to give all the details in revelation tv, but you are blind to see his intentions that he did not intend to answer that question honestly. The answer could have been between a "local and a "global" and what he did was an put more doubts about his belief. EVEN YOU cannot explain what he meant by that answer, you're belief have no leg to stand on.

[Jed153]

From the reading of the Genesis account of the Flood in the English translation it would seem that it was worldwide in scope if we take the passages involved strictly literally. Various passages tell us that life was to be destroyed from the face of the "earth" (Genesis 7:12), the waters were on the face of the whole "earth" (Genesis 8:9), etc.

[Jed153]

When these passages were written it would be hard to believe they were made with the understanding of a global planet. We have to recall that it was not much more than 500 years ago that people believed the "earth" was flat. The word "earth" used in these passages of Genesis is the Hebrew word "erets" (Strong's O.T.#776).

[Jed153]

Erets does not actually carry any connotation of a global, spherical planet in its translation. While it has been translated as "earth" many times, it is also translated "country" 140 times, "land" 1,476 times, and "ground" 96 times in the Old Testament. In the various references to erets it can be shown it is most often used to infer a limited land area rather than the entire planet.