Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Debunk #2 of Hadley: a study in fakery

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
552 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 23, 2009

Since Professor Rourke still insists that the slope to the right of the top ridge on Mount Hadley can not be correct, based on NASA's topographic map of the Apollo 15 landing site, I figured that I should show him that it is indeed correct by overlaying NASA's topographic map onto Google Earth's 3D view of the landing site.

Don't believe this debunk video? Download my Google Earth KMZ file which overlays NASA's topographic map of the AP15 landing site and see for yourself:

http://www.mem-tek.com/apollo/GoogleEarth_KMZ_files/AP15/GoneToPlaid_AP15.kmz

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (GoneToPlaid)

  • I think all should consider just who supplied google with the data.....Ahhhh

    The idea that man went to the moon is totally laughable.

  • Oh really? Just why is the idea that men went to the moon totally laughable. As a kid I watched the Apollo landings on TV. Some relatives of mine went to the cape and watched an Apollo launch. Yet again, just why is the idea that men went to the moon totally laughable?

  • Nice work, GTP! But what happened to the Holst?

  • This was just a quick video. No audio -- sorry. Check out my newest coup de grace debunk #3 video which I just uploaded. It is HD, so it might be a bit before YouTube processes it for best quality.

  • So, what makes you think a conspiracist can understand a topo-map anyway?

  • I don't rightly know! :-)

see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @guesser7

    You are the one that is totally laughable.

  • There was no way to fake it, dude.

  • @obaeyens

    I hope Rourke merely was suckered into believing in the moon landing conspiracy due to his email communications with Jack White. Perhaps, if Rourke hadn't contacted Jack White, Rourke might have gone back and reexamined his hypotheses and conclusions, and then seen the errors in his methodology.

    Conspiracy nuts like Jack White can be very persuasive if you don't do your own homework and simply take them at their word. Just take a look at Jarrah's videos based on straw man theory.

  • I think that Rourke his credibility as a professor is killed now. What else has infected his research. with the conspiracy poison How many papers of his are also unscientifically because he used conspiracy logic.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more