"Name one" - Hitchens on Hardball

Joan Walsh claims Christopher Hitchens's views on the Clinton's integrity are cherry-picked interpretations supported by "facts that aren't necessarily facts."

Christopher asks her to name one.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Christopher
• Hitchens;
• Name
• One
• Hardball
• Chris
• Matthews
• Joan
• Walsh
• Hillary
• Clinton
• Obama

[guthzammysara]

@Mrscot148

So... Starving children in Africa that are so skinny, you can see the definition of their bones, and so hungry, they haven't eaten in days, and so sick, they will probably die of AIDS... is for your God's good pleasure?

Your "God" is sick. He should burn in the hell he created.

[NeroSNT]

gotta love the way he always had anyone in check mate

[mattyohe]

@timewilltell7 Let's leave the NWO at the door.

[trakkaton]

@Ragedhard

Don't parade your ignorance. You neither understood what I said, nor could you prove it wrong, nor do you have the slightest clue what my view of the topic of the televised debate is, instead you are making ridiculous assumptions and a lot of noise, with egomania on top.

[Ragedhard]

@trakkaton

You're pretty daft. The use of "rubble" meaning what you are saying it means in her metaphor is debatable. It sounds like you're just desperately trying to make people believe her accusations weren't as horrendously sloppy and poorly constructed. Making things up because you think they might be right and then claiming they are fact might work for intellectually crippled mongoloids like yourself, but for superior intellectuals like myself that just doesn't cut it.

[trakkaton]

@lungpatrol

It's not her fault if you don't understand what a metaphor is. The use of the word "rubble" strongly implies that a debate has been debated to death with no useful outcome. THAT assertion would be a be a legitimate target for a reply, but not the parroting of "name one". It is the obvious sign that Hitchens does not listen.

[trakkaton]

@guthzammysara

You have to ask if really it is for YOUR god's pleasure. You and everyone else have to ask whether YOUR god is money, western fascism, affluent chauvinism.

[TheCoolerChannel]

@guthzammysara i was unaware that God made these people so faulty

[timewilltell7]

@asubjectiveopinion

i dont think we'll ever know who is behind it all - but i do think there is a cabal - probably of no religions - they're using these 3 religions to mass hypnotise and divide the world

however it still means we have to expose the lies, orchestrated debt and suffering they're instigating - look how many they are killing - with protesting against them they become more and more answerable and might eventually start serving the people like they should be

[timewilltell7]

@asubjectiveopinion

i agree with you 100% on jones and icke and that they're doing it for money but maxwell isnt - just my instinct.. i dont ignore that one bit thats why i wouldnt pay to see icke

ok so they could be using our hardship to make money however it doesnt mean there isn't hardship and i think we should try to change things and speak out about it starting by fighting their 3 religions which to me seem to be turning people into believers before they're old enough to think

[asubjectiveopinion]

@timewilltell7

I would define 'it/the unified conspiracy theory' as the concept that the world's social and economic ills are the result of a planned program of depopulation by an "enemy within" (Jews, catholics, aliens, reptiles, NWO, British Empire, nazis, Jesuits etc depending on the version that you've chosen to believe) that secretly orchestrates world events in accordance with an agenda so secret that only a few hundred-thousand people on the internet are aware of it.