'A Universe From Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss, AAI 2009

What do you mean "There is no heaven, nor hell"? Can you prove that statement or is that just a hope of yours?

There is no heaven, nor hell, nutjob.

When one dies, the only thing that happens is that one decomposes. Slowly and inexorably.

No soul. No judgment. No post-life cookie. Nor a post-life spanking. That's all imaginary stuff made up by people who want you to send them money every Sabbath.

Your question wasn't sincere. You're a religious nut who would replace centuries of scientific evidence in place of his own admitted ignorance.

My original comment stands. Either learn something or STFU.

Idiot.
THEORIES are BETTER than facts.

Theories EXPLAIN facts. Theory is the BEST level of explanation, reserved for the HIGHEST level of thought.

At the core of modern theoretical physics is something called "the truth".

If you think the Earth is 6000 years old, you're merely delusional.

500 years ago, you would be gleefully burning heliocentrists at the stake for their heresy.

If God sends one to hell for not worshipping him,,he is arrogant and self absorbed,which are sins,which makes him a figment of your pea sized brain..Also another deep thought..Christians..why did God create Satan anyways?

RKPDRMR. Of course there cannot be any evidence that we are not created by an intelligent designer. That is why evolution, atheism are religions. They are beliefs. And what a chance to take when we have God the Creator's Word. Especially when it speaks of there being 2 places to go for eternity, Heaven or Hell. Hey, Larry Krauss and Dick Dawkins where are you going to spend eternity? One more thing Larry, do you understand how long eternity is? You, too Dick....?

middlekk, You are talking about "theory" not facts. When a discipline has at its core a lie then any theory that arises from it is going to be adulterated. At the core of modern theoretical physics and or cosmology is the discredited flawed idea called evolution and even deeper than that is the "old Earth". Why begin with assumptions? Haven't we learned our lessens from the flat-earthers? Also, why the assumption that the speed of light is the same in deep space? Krauss is such a dolt!

"STFU about your ignorance about the evidence"?

Real nice way to reply to a sincere question.

I'm glad most teachers out there don't have that attitude.

It's too bad that the original order of the comments gets changed.

It really distorts the original flow.

Um...I wasn't replying to you.

Self-absorbed, much?