Nalbandian vs Ferrer Toronto 2010 Highlights
Top Comments
All Comments (15)
-
@BrotherTree1 ferrer is a warrior, intense, never say die, competitor, gasquet lacks that kind of intensity and competitive drive. he doesn´t seem to have that fire in him.
-
480p ????
-
@kenkyuen Haha good one!
-
thenoblequran (Ctrl+Enter)
-
both these guy´s are great player´s/competitor´s..althoug
h ferrer is just much more consistent and well conditioned physically...nalbandian on the other hand, has more talent/skill and firepower.. -
@foul01 yeah but the problem is, no one cares about gasquet lol -- and plus, he sucks only when it comes to match points. David has lost all types of hard matches, 2 sets up ones, ones where he had to fight back from 2 sets down (only to lose in 5 sets), the whole mixed bag. gasquet is a dumbass -- just loses huge leads -- what a faggot. Ferrer = a Martyr....Gasquet = a joke. he doesn't put in as much work into tennis as david does. David is a tortured soldier. Richard is a tortured idiot.
-
like what?
ferrer has either won convincingly or lost convincing during his best years, hard to say thats a heartbreak
gasquet has lost 4 two-sets-to-love-leads in slams alone, not to mention a few minor ones when he was serving for the match or even had match points like just recently against niemenen
-
ferrer has got to have suffered the most heartbreaks out of all the players on the tour. even worse than gasquet probly.
Does anyone else think the commentor sounds likes Raymond from Everybody loves Raymond?
kenkyuen 10 months ago 8
great editing, great upload, great outcome.
angryniggah 1 year ago 7