Evolution Debunked By National Geographic

Sir David Attenborough and National Geographic debunk the Theory of Evolution.
Source BBC

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• jesus
• national
• geographic
• bbc
• david
• attenborough
• evolution
• natural
• selection
• intelligent
• design
• christian
• obama
• antichrist
• devil
• hell
• NWO
• atheism

[ProfMTH]

"Without going too much into detail...."

LOL! Of course, if you went into *any* detail, you'd have to admit that David Attenborough didn't say what you claimed he said.

I must say I take some comfort in the fact that it's a Brit demonstrating such ignorance of science and poor listening skills. All too often it's one of my fellow Americans who display such things when it comes to this topic.

[Katalyzt]

Please educate yourself on the fact of Evolution.

Katalyzt

[freak777power]

@mpfield1966

It is very sad that you just said retarded thing.

[MasonicEyes]

@MasonsAreAbomination There are far less cases of skin cancer in africa, alot of this cancer, is from industrialization and refined foods.

[Digdigs2]

gorilla999 - the original uploader of this vid censors his comments section! bloody funny, really. anyone who disagrees with his is blocked. Insecure much??? Well, I guess it is a favorite tactic of the religious - it worked to keep Galileo out of public knowledge for a while...

[thesharft]

@MasonsAreAbomination I dont know if this is entirely true, but ive heard or read somewhere that radiation has become more damaging due to us damaging the ozone layer. Also, clearly animals and humans do adapt to sunlight, since african people have far more melanin to block the sunrays than kaukasian people.

[thesharft]

Whoa, is this guy serious?? That's not even an argument. The evolution-devolution thing is just a stupid play of words. It happens at times. Fish evolve into land vertebrates, and some evolve back into dolphins. I dont see the problem with reverse evolution. And yes, i can easily believe that humans would devolve back into an ape-like animal. If at some point we no longer have enough food available to sustain our large brains, there would be selection for dumber, more efficient 'humans'.

[TheOrionStar]

reversion is actually very common in nature de-evolving would mean the bats got worse at surviving do u think that is happening here? or have they found a better way to hunt a way which was used in their evolutionary past

[Nigeman]

I think what he was saying was that bats have developed behavioural traits that resemble shrews, not that they have physically lost their wings and become shrews.

[probotvideo]

You are a complete idiot. That clip does not remotely imply that evolution is not real.

[TheVince0909]

Completely correct, that dude was a fuckn retard at best

[mpfield1966]

You are a retard... fish left the sea, evolving as amphibians, through reptiles, to mammals. Some of these mammals evolved into whales and returned to the sea and evolved fins and tails from limbs and hands. Reverse evolution is not possible? Evolution is always forward in terms of an organism's ability to survive the process of natural selection. Your attempt here is so fundamentally weak intellectually. It is really sad that you are such an embarrassment to humanity.