The reason has been made known for a number of years - Jacqueline Pearce had been contracted for a set number of episodes that season and all of these were used up. There was no extra money in the budget to contract her for the last episode. While it would have been nice, it leaves the climax solely focused on Blake and Avon - as it should have been.
I think it was a damn shame arch-enemy Servalan was omitted from the final episode called Blake, but the reason for that is unknown even nearly thirty years later. I think Servalan sould have been in the final episode and she should have shot Dayna dead, instead of Arlen once Dayna was shot dead Avon or Tarrant should have shot their arrch-enemy Servalan dead. It would have been billions of times better if that had happened, it would have killed off arch-enemy Servalan irrevocably and finally.
Avon became obsessed in series 4, just like blake did back in series 2.
waterfieldV 4 months ago
The reason has been made known for a number of years - Jacqueline Pearce had been contracted for a set number of episodes that season and all of these were used up. There was no extra money in the budget to contract her for the last episode. While it would have been nice, it leaves the climax solely focused on Blake and Avon - as it should have been.
ShaquiUK 10 months ago
I think it was a damn shame arch-enemy Servalan was omitted from the final episode called Blake, but the reason for that is unknown even nearly thirty years later. I think Servalan sould have been in the final episode and she should have shot Dayna dead, instead of Arlen once Dayna was shot dead Avon or Tarrant should have shot their arrch-enemy Servalan dead. It would have been billions of times better if that had happened, it would have killed off arch-enemy Servalan irrevocably and finally.
rojblake82 1 year ago