Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

DISC GENERATOR

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
40,335
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 12, 2009

You may find this interesant...
A better way of produce AC.
DON'T FORGHET TO PRESS PAUSE IN ORDER TO FINISH REDING EACH SLIDE !

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this seems fishy, more little magnets with more air gaps seems less efficient to me, especially with all those little contacts you would need and all the various mechanical tolerances that would need to be increased to accomodate them (i.e. the air gaps that are decreasing the efficiency, furthermore putting two magnets next to each other facing opposite directions just increases the amount of the field that travels sideways.

  • 2:30 - so your plan is to have a windturbine (with a generator in it as they mostly do) hooked to a electrical engine that drives the discs? I'm sorry but as far as i know you can't create more elecricity out of less electricity (Excuse me but didn't some scientist already state this?

    Also i didn't understand how the lever comes in to this?

    But im no genious it might work, even though i think you shouldve created a sollution to make the coils move the other way instead of being stationairy

  • @AdlerMow yes, indeed

  • This will probably result in a high voltage low current generator. All things equal, if you have two poles rotor and stator at say 600rpm, and 6v at 1A, you will have 12v at 0.5A, so to say. The higher the number poles at the same rpm, higher the voltage. I don't know if it will more efficient. More efficient comparing to what? Now your "disc generator" will be the opposite of Faraday's Disk, an homopolar generator, how ironic!

  • But English is not your native language, and I suggest you find someone from Britain, the US, Canada,or Australia to help you write your text, because I could not understand your post. Good luck with that.

  • As someone else already mentioned, electric generators (as well as electric alternators and electric motors) are already very efficient; generators are already many more times more efficient than the fuel-powered engines that drive our vehicles and electric generating stations. We need to switch from ICEs to electric motors in our cars. An increase in alternator efficiency of just one per cent would still mean a savings of billions of dollars per year due to their widespread use. (cont'd)

  • Also you use more cooper than a common generator, and the most important thing, the power you generate into inner coils are less than outer coils.

  • To solve this you have to put in paralel all the coils from each radial section, and you must to use a thinner coil from inner coils, more and more thin when you are close to the center, to generate more fem(voltage) to get the same voltage from each section coils, and then you will can put all the coils in paralel. Maybe, industry doesn't use that generators because is much difficult to make that system than a common system, in many ways.

  • You have to know that, this system have a big problem.Speed along disc radius it's not the same, so the induced FEM from each section coils wouldn't be the same, that means, the inner coils would be like a half resistors.

  • you use GENERATOR to do the same thing .

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more