this seems fishy, more little magnets with more air gaps seems less efficient to me, especially with all those little contacts you would need and all the various mechanical tolerances that would need to be increased to accomodate them (i.e. the air gaps that are decreasing the efficiency, furthermore putting two magnets next to each other facing opposite directions just increases the amount of the field that travels sideways.
2:30 - so your plan is to have a windturbine (with a generator in it as they mostly do) hooked to a electrical engine that drives the discs? I'm sorry but as far as i know you can't create more elecricity out of less electricity (Excuse me but didn't some scientist already state this?
Also i didn't understand how the lever comes in to this?
But im no genious it might work, even though i think you shouldve created a sollution to make the coils move the other way instead of being stationairy
This will probably result in a high voltage low current generator. All things equal, if you have two poles rotor and stator at say 600rpm, and 6v at 1A, you will have 12v at 0.5A, so to say. The higher the number poles at the same rpm, higher the voltage. I don't know if it will more efficient. More efficient comparing to what? Now your "disc generator" will be the opposite of Faraday's Disk, an homopolar generator, how ironic!
But English is not your native language, and I suggest you find someone from Britain, the US, Canada,or Australia to help you write your text, because I could not understand your post. Good luck with that.
As someone else already mentioned, electric generators (as well as electric alternators and electric motors) are already very efficient; generators are already many more times more efficient than the fuel-powered engines that drive our vehicles and electric generating stations. We need to switch from ICEs to electric motors in our cars. An increase in alternator efficiency of just one per cent would still mean a savings of billions of dollars per year due to their widespread use. (cont'd)
To solve this you have to put in paralel all the coils from each radial section, and you must to use a thinner coil from inner coils, more and more thin when you are close to the center, to generate more fem(voltage) to get the same voltage from each section coils, and then you will can put all the coils in paralel. Maybe, industry doesn't use that generators because is much difficult to make that system than a common system, in many ways.
You have to know that, this system have a big problem.Speed along disc radius it's not the same, so the induced FEM from each section coils wouldn't be the same, that means, the inner coils would be like a half resistors.
this seems fishy, more little magnets with more air gaps seems less efficient to me, especially with all those little contacts you would need and all the various mechanical tolerances that would need to be increased to accomodate them (i.e. the air gaps that are decreasing the efficiency, furthermore putting two magnets next to each other facing opposite directions just increases the amount of the field that travels sideways.
MaterialSam 2 weeks ago
2:30 - so your plan is to have a windturbine (with a generator in it as they mostly do) hooked to a electrical engine that drives the discs? I'm sorry but as far as i know you can't create more elecricity out of less electricity (Excuse me but didn't some scientist already state this?
Also i didn't understand how the lever comes in to this?
But im no genious it might work, even though i think you shouldve created a sollution to make the coils move the other way instead of being stationairy
gastank43 1 month ago
@AdlerMow yes, indeed
gastank43 1 month ago
This will probably result in a high voltage low current generator. All things equal, if you have two poles rotor and stator at say 600rpm, and 6v at 1A, you will have 12v at 0.5A, so to say. The higher the number poles at the same rpm, higher the voltage. I don't know if it will more efficient. More efficient comparing to what? Now your "disc generator" will be the opposite of Faraday's Disk, an homopolar generator, how ironic!
AdlerMow 1 month ago
But English is not your native language, and I suggest you find someone from Britain, the US, Canada,or Australia to help you write your text, because I could not understand your post. Good luck with that.
billdale1 2 months ago
As someone else already mentioned, electric generators (as well as electric alternators and electric motors) are already very efficient; generators are already many more times more efficient than the fuel-powered engines that drive our vehicles and electric generating stations. We need to switch from ICEs to electric motors in our cars. An increase in alternator efficiency of just one per cent would still mean a savings of billions of dollars per year due to their widespread use. (cont'd)
billdale1 2 months ago
Also you use more cooper than a common generator, and the most important thing, the power you generate into inner coils are less than outer coils.
TheMunetaka 2 months ago
To solve this you have to put in paralel all the coils from each radial section, and you must to use a thinner coil from inner coils, more and more thin when you are close to the center, to generate more fem(voltage) to get the same voltage from each section coils, and then you will can put all the coils in paralel. Maybe, industry doesn't use that generators because is much difficult to make that system than a common system, in many ways.
TheMunetaka 2 months ago
You have to know that, this system have a big problem.Speed along disc radius it's not the same, so the induced FEM from each section coils wouldn't be the same, that means, the inner coils would be like a half resistors.
TheMunetaka 2 months ago
you use GENERATOR to do the same thing .
greenearthnazi20204u 3 months ago