Mirage 2000-5 vs. Jas 39 gripen
Top Comments
All Comments (63)
-
@TheSwekebab And you think that we have not. Throw an eye on RBE2-AA (Active Antenna) ^ ^
-
it does not have as to compare they are different things, the Mirrage is one hunting of third 4 generation and gripen of generation.
-
Cengiz78x Suck on that asshole
-
"I have personally spoken to some of the people of F17 staff, and the general consensus is that(exact translation) the Gripens kicked a**.
One thing that really stood out was the difficulty in detecting the Gripens on radar which proved to be close to impossible. The radar controllers were very impressed with the Gripens inbuilt jamming systems, it made them pretty much invulnerable. There were losses on the blue side in every mission, but AFAIK none of them were Tango Red's Gripens".
-
@Cengiz78x U better do your homework U stupid fuck. The radarsystem in Gripen is way better than the Nato-standard radarsystem. But The radar system in Gripen was not Nato-compatability so SAAB had to downgrade the system for those who decide the Gripen. And for your information Gripen gave the best intell in Libya.
-
Mirage 2000 stands no chance against an F-16 or F-18 and underpowered Gayripen with a short range crappy radar stands no chance against a Mirage 2000. So the correct comparison would be..... F-16>Mirage 2000>swedish junk gayripen
-
Your video suck!!!
-
@devrerffs Did those upgrades made Mirage slower too?
-
@DINDRAGON First JAS did maybe just do 2.0 mach, but it has been updated with better engines many times..
-
haz un combate en lock on aver quien gana
@oiseautempete You obviusly dont know what you are talking abaut. Gripen can carry just as moutch weapons as any modern fighter today. Gripen carries a AESA radar witch is moutch better than Mirages, and it is faster and more flexible. Mirrage would probably lose against Gripens preddecessor, JA37 Viggen, this isnt a fair match.
TheSwekebab 3 months ago 7
damn this is all about "i have the biggest balls" here !
bingofioul 9 months ago 6