Uncivilised Creationist

Uncivilised PM I got from a loving christian...

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheJaredJammer

***edit 11 April***
Should anyone wonder how often this occurs, just take a look at the comments on my channel. At least she has the balls to do it in public.
***

Now, I have to point out that this wasn't the first PM of this kind that I've received from other theists. I usually ignore and delete them, or I will reply back with some wisdom of my own.

Today, I just didn't feel like doing either. I don't know why, but it got to me, so I decided to make a video and vent.



LOL, I even got honours!

Honors for this video (10)
#7 - Most Discussed (Today) - Education
#26 - Most Discussed (This Week) - Education
#84 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Australia
#86 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Canada
#52 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - United Kingdom
#71 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education
#22 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Netherlands
#40 - Top Favorites (Today) - Education
#20 - Top Rated (Today) - Education
#46 - Top Rated (This Week) - Education

Category:

Education

Tags:

• atheist
• atheism
• creationism
• ID
• jared
• is
• an
• uncivilised
• twat

[Baszottbivaly]

Actually, I left that fucktard a lot of PM's pointing out all his misinformation for example celery: he says it looks like a bone, and is made up of 24% sodium, just like a bone, (or around that number. Well, apart from that it looks nothing like a bone, it only has 0.12% sodium in it- (google) So far, he did not answer, and my Pm's did not appear. (I did this almost a week ago...)

[Atheistblindchick]

I don't think they ever will...

I'm not familiar with the celery argument, but misinformation and misrepresentation are two common tools used by certain creationists...

[Baszottbivaly]

There is some issue with your vids: Your responses are just out of place sometimes. LITERALLY. They are on the top of the comment list, one after another, and I'm mostly unable to tell that to which comment it is in response to. Is this some glitch? I've only seen this with your vids...

[Atheistblindchick]

No, this is normal... Latest comments are at the top of the list...

There is a button or link or something under the comments that says "see all comments", click on that one...

[Atheistblindchick]

At least, I think it's under the comments, when I tab through, I get to that after the last comment on the page... But then again, tab order isn't logical here on YT...

[HaleyMary]

What amazes me about some of these creationists is they complain about atheists being uncivilized and then turn around and do the exact same thing. I also don't like when people approve comments before having them on their channel. It's like a form of censorship, you know? If only one side is heard, it isn't a debate, it just turns into something silly and childish.

[Atheistblindchick]

Very true, but some people just do not want people to comment since it might show others that their arguments are flawed...

These are the kind of people who think it's good to lie for god...

[rotcafarg]

Or anyone.

[TheAgnosticAspie]

What a disgusting thing for a christian to say

[TheAgnosticAspie]

@JaredJammer69 almost all arguments I've seen in favor of I.D. are based on flawed logic and psuedo-mathematical assumptions. William demski commits many errors in his book "The Design Reference". It is a slate of hand where the design theorist inflates certain probablistic resources in order to make design look more probable and chance and necessity less probable.

[TheAgnosticAspie]

@JaredJammer69, honestly, by far the most dishonest people in the world I have meet and from many psycology studies are ones who have a stuborn and dogmatic faith. I consider religious fundamentalism to be a psychosis, probably a malfunctioning of the temporal lobe of the brain, which affects cognitive thought and critical thinking. (cont).

[JaredJammer69]

@TawntheAtheist

I'd recommend Stephen C. Meyer's "Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design".

It's one of the greatest science books of all-time and has presented a case for I.D. so strong that even God-denialists must accept it (highly respected secularist Thomas Nagel called it the book of the year).

If you're too cheap to buy a book or have difficulty reading past a second grade level, try searching for videos of Stephen C. Meyer lectures/debates. He's brilliant.

[JaredJammer69]

@clubmondobizarre

My videos required comment approval because of the vitriol and dishonesty spewed by the typical "chancedunnit" God-denialist. I will not allow such people to besmirch my videos with their irrationality. If a God-denialist wants to post a civilized, intelligent comment, it will be approved. Unfortunately those are even more rare than a beneficial mutation.

[JaredJammer69]

From the tags for this video...

"jared is an uncivilised twat"

Whoa... double-standards from a God-denialist? Who could've seen that coming?

Oh that's right. Everyone. Even Atheistblindchick could've seen that coming. That's because research has shown that God-denialists value honesty far less than do the overwhelming majority who don't deny God's existence.

[JaredJammer69]

@jackeasyking

So says the God-denialist. supporter of the religion that's brought more death and destruction to the world in a single century than all other religions, combined (including theism and deism), in the total of world history.

Surely you have more important things to do, like concocting excuses for why killing unborn babies is acceptable or explaining why not a single piece of evidence for Darwinian macroevolution has been discovered in 150 years of searching.

[JaredJammer69]

@werecow2003

My factual arguments remain unrefuted.

I welcome any God-denialist or Intelligent Designophobic to join IMDb's Expelled message board and present their evidence that "chancedunnit". Such a view simply can't hold up against the breathtakingly huge amount of evidence which shows life to be sophisticated nano-machinery operating under strict laws and design-principles -- EXACTLY what one would expect from Intelligent Design.

Darwin's predictions flopped. I.D.'s hit the bullseye.

[JaredJammer69]

@TheAgnosticAspie

I'm not a Christian, but then we can't expect honesty from irrational God-denialists, now can we?

Of course not.

[JaredJammer69]

3) Jared Jammer is not a creationist. He does not believe the Earth to be 6,000 years old, nor does he believe mankind was created, ex nihilo, in his present-day form. Jared Jammer is an Intelligent Design proponent. This is because the evidence for I.D. is overwhelming, every bit as strong as the evidence for the law of gravity. This is based on the complex, specified information required for life's origin and our deep knowledge that such information is only produced by intelligent causation.

[JaredJammer69]

Dishonesty from an atheist? Shocking.

1) Jared Jammer is not, nor has ever claimed to be, loving, especially not towards God-denialists. He considers them to be dangerous, self-centered people. That's based on their history of violence, death, destruction and bad behavior, including here at YouTube.

2) Jared Jammer is not a Christian but a deist. His belief in God comes entirely from logic and the empirical evidence of the finely-tuned, rational universe and it's mathematical structure.