Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

0.999... = 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
56,712
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 4, 2007

Mathematical proofs that 0.999... = 1.

Deal with it!

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 133 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (CousinoMacul)

  • Oh repeating decimals, they do go on forever...but we don't. 

  • @madmatix Recurring things and quotient rings make way for other joys.

  • Not really; it just shows that 1 isn't divisible by 3 or any other number.

    Because if what you say was accurate, that would mean we could do the exact same thing with "1/2 + 1/2 = 2/2 = 1" and get 0.999...

    But if you try it you will get 0.888...

  • @OhMyFreakingGoshh Divisibility doesn't enter into this since we're talking about the real numbers, not the integers.

    What you say about 1/2 is true in base 9 (in base 9, 0.888...=1), but in base 10, 1/2=0.5 is not a repeating decimal.

  • Fraction form = rational

    Decimal form = irrational

    Irrational (does not) = rational

    My beard is a windmill and your argument is invalid.

  • @utsudoshi Nope! Rational means it can be written as integer fraction. All repeating decimals are rational. Here's how to find their fraction: 1) Take repeating part 2) count how many digits it has (call that n) 3) divide by 10^n - 1 For example, 0.277277277... = 277/999 (999=10^3 - 1) Also, 0.19191919... = 19/99 And of course, 0.999... = 9/9 = 1 Try it out yourself on any repeating decimal if you don't believe me.

Top Comments

  • I'll believe you when you can write .9999999.... to infinity. :)

see all

All Comments (1,601)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @CousinoMacul Joys?

  • All this means is that you can translate a fraction into decimal form, but you cannot translate a decimal back into a fraction; something is lost in the process.

  • This is fake! In your second proof:

    If x=.9999....., then 10x is not 9.99999....

    10x is 9.999999......0, zero from multiple must go to the end of digit.

  • @CousinoMacul Base 9, Base 10? What's that? :S

  • This guy just showed a couple of proofs. For those of you who disagrees, please stop acting you know everything and GTFO. Come back when you've taken first year university level math course.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more