The Theory of Evolution in less than two minutes

http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution

The Theory of Evolution in less than two minutes.
Evolution for intellectuals.
Video reply to DumExodus2's video with a similar title.
Let's see if he accepts it.
Credits to ScienceAgainstEvolution.


For Intellectuals

The title slide shows a book cover that looks remarkably like Evolution for Dummies. It uses a similar color scheme, layout, and fonts. The irony is that this book is for intellectuals rather than dummies.

There are two kinds of evolutionists: innocently ignorant evolutionists and intimidated intellectual evolutionists.

Innocently ignorant evolutionists arent dummies—they have just fallen victim to the one-sided propaganda preached in public schools. They arent stupid—they just dont know the truth because it has been censored. They accept, without question, evolution is a fact, just because someone told them so. Most of them dont know anything about evolution. Therefore, most of them will be confused by our video. Hopefully, it will get them to ponder things they have been told, and realize how utterly unscientific the theory of evolution really is.

There are only a few intimidated intellectual evolutionists. There are so few of them that you know who they are. We are talking about people like Eugenie C. Scott, Jerry Coyne, Richard Dawkins, and the editors of Discover Magazine. If you read their work, it becomes immediately apparent that they believe in evolution because they dont believe what Dawkins calls, the God delusion.

They reason that evolution must be true because there isnt any supernatural creator. They are intimidated because they fear that if evolution isnt true, a mean, vengeful God will torture them eternally for their unbelief and disobedience. Because of their distorted view of religion, they steadfastly refuse to acknowledge the truth that is staring them right in the face. They call upon all of their intellectual powers to deny the obvious flaws and inconsistencies in the theory of evolution. Witness all the excuses we pointed out last month in Jerry Coynes book.

We titled our video Evolution for Intellectuals because it presents the theory of evolution from the intimidated intellectual point of view. It makes scientifically absurd statements as if they were undeniable facts.

Reactions to our video will vary. Innocently ignorant evolutionists will be confused because they wont get too many of the jokes. Hopefully, it will get them to thinking. Intimidated intellectual evolutionists will be greatly angered by our video because they will get the jokes, and will realize that they expose the absurdity of their claims. But since their belief in evolution is based on fear rather than reason, our video wont have much affect on them. Creationists will get all the jokes, will laugh, and love the video.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• theory of evolution
• FirstFreedomFighter
• science
• biology
• abiogenesis
• dinosaur
• cell
• frankencell
• amoeba
• life
• earth
• scientist
• scientific
• etc. etc.

[nottebaccio]

@gregrutz "Hey Rocky! Want to see me pull a rabbit out of my hat?" - Um sure Bullwinkle .. but don't you need a hat to pull the rabbit out of??? So the people at The Origin of Life Foundation are not Darwinists??? Or is that totally irrelevant to the fact that they desperately need a way to get the Origin of Species off to a Naturalistic start??

"Does a rock need instructions to "know" which way to fall? That's the first time in my experience to have a rock used in a straw-man argument.

[nottebaccio]

@ZZzzzzzWhat & gregrutz You need to talk your atheist friends into using a dictionary to understand and define basic terms and to assimilate some basic logic.

"atheism is the absence of belief" was taken directly from atheists. Awww to bad ;)

[turbowombat]

@SummerSunshine1988 This shows a misunderstanding of the word theory. Theories and facts aren't mutually exclusive. Theories explain facts. Facts delineate observations. It's a fact that a dropped object on earth is observed to will fall, this is explained through the theory of gravity. God is not a theory because positing him does not explain anything, it simply asserts an entity capable of resolving a given problem. This is called an argument from ignorance; EX: "I don't know, therefore god."

[turbowombat]

Most of this video talks about the process of evolution, not the theory. Ergo; dislike for false advertising.

[SummerSunshine1988]

@MrThaPatrick : There's a reason God doesn't qualify as a theory. He isn't a theory. He is a fact.

[MrThaPatrick]

@SummerSunshine1988 comprises a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.*God*don't qualify for even a theory

[MrPreston49]

This is great, I am a science guy and even I can see that evolution isnt science,as the theories just keep getting more and more bizarre

[BlessElShaddai]

Great...

[SummerSunshine1988]

There's a reason evolution is called a theory. God is the truth.