Ministeri Ernst von Bornin puhe rauhanteon johdosta
Uploader Comments (tupakki)
All Comments (83)
-
@tarimdarya Even this is old comment but I still reply. Finland di not NOT attack USSR. The Finnish Karelians got mad because the oppression of USSR. Finnish soldiers volunteered to fight beside them and that why that war was called "heimosodat" (tribe wars). And the Karelia has always belonged to us. Just because you were the one ruling our area because Finland was part of Russia it doesn't mean it's yours. Just sayin´
-
Objection!
It was harvest of Stalin's systematic persecution.
By the way, we buried only corpses. It's normal procedure in Finland.
I think you have double standard in burial.
-
During the Second World War, also had a lot of crimes against humanity.Itreblenie prisoners in concentration camps. Then the known facts: the territory of Karelia Russian civilian, buried alive in the ground.
-
Yes. By the way, during the Zmne War, Finnish troops have committed crimes against gummanizma. In Karelia, in boilers, which were krasnoaremeytsy. When they came out hungry environments, jeered at them.
-
5. And when, by March 40. The Soviet Army reached the highway to Helsinki, Mannerheim asked the world, Stalin agreed, only because the victory was a "Pyrrhic victory".
-
4. Since the war, Stalin did not mean to add only a part of Karelia and the isthmus. It has already been established "people's government Kuusenena" and formed "people's Finnish army" from Karelia and finov. from all over the USSR.
Перевод: русский > английскийПоказать латиницей
In Finland, had a chance to save the Karelian isthmus and part Kaeli.
That if the whole Finland, stalaby be part of the USSR.
Maybe when the USSR broke up, she would have left these lands. But the Finns are very eogo not like))) and choose your path.
MrDiokletian 1 year ago
@MrDiokletian Please. Say one thing at the time. Now it's impossible to understand what you mean by this text. I pick one thing. Finnish people never buried any russian civilians alive into ground. If you ment that. It's just some kind of propaganda.
"2. You propose twice as much territory in Karelia - is a fact." It was just Stalin's plan as Yuri Kilin for example reveals. Just giving false hope for finns.
Are you also saying that Finland was a threat for Leningrad? That's not true at all.
tupakki 1 year ago
@MrDiokletian "In Finland, had a chance to save the Karelian isthmus and part Kaeli." What you mean by this?
"But the Finns are very eogo not like))) and choose your path. " What this means?
tupakki 1 year ago
So those boundaries in which Finland gained its independence from the Bolsheviks. This certificate is a very good attitude to Finam Russian emperor.
MrDiokletian 1 year ago
@MrDiokletian I am not sure what you mean by this. Can you explain?
tupakki 1 year ago
And also in 1811 in the Grand Duchy were transferred Viipari and Kekislm okruga.Finny were very happy, what proof is. that during the Crimean War of 1854-1856 year, the Allies could not hope for or as Finwë revolt against Russia.
MrDiokletian 1 year ago
@MrDiokletian The year was actually 1812 not 1811. Finns really were happy you are right about that. Finns really loved those times. You are right about the Crimean War and brits attacked against finnish coast and some finnish prisoners were sent to England. Finns also participated 1877-1878 Russo-Turkish War. Everything changed when Soviet Union attacked against Finland and forced us to make a peace and hand those areas to Soviet Union. That trust were no more.
tupakki 1 year ago