The War on Neuroscience : Part 1
Loading...
13,589
see all
Video Responses
This video is a response to O Necessary Sin of Adam (Does Christian Theology Need Adam & Eve?)
Loading...
Well I see Veritas doing what is a simple old trick of abstract language.
'aboutness' probably doesn't mean anything at all that doesn't have the specific function of helping his argument.
Hyardacil 5 days ago
Moby Dick just had the plot as a back drop. It was a beautiful discussion of everything from psychology to history
SephieRothe 2 weeks ago
in response to ... Fat German Bastard :D :D :D
Neshuah1 3 weeks ago
@zarkoff45 (part 2) From what I have heard of Dennett's response to the p-zombie argument it is simply an exercise in question begging.
If you define a mind exclusively in behavioristic terms (producing mental language etc.) then of course there will be no difference between a conscious person and a p-zombie. But defining a person in purely behavioristic terms was the issue of contention in the first place.
Or did I miss something?
JohananRaatz 2 months ago
@zarkoff45: People don't have a problem with neuroscience. What they have a problem with is eliminativism masquerading as neuroscience.
Now some people can't tell the difference between philosophy of mind and neuroscience. But that is more indicative of a category error on their part than on a "war on neuroscience" by people who are self-aware that they aren't p-zombies.
Yes there will be a scientific explanation of the mind -explaining it away isn't the same as explaining it though.
JohananRaatz 2 months ago
@luisisrael15 And who studies the Mind? The Flying Spaghetti Monster, of course.
M4tuX 3 months ago
Holy HELL!
This was painful to watch!
...who the hell makes a video on material which requires concentration, with both a voice-over AND shitloadsa text ???
...Not to mention how your perspective of the universe is, to say the least, chilling.
SnazzyPazzyMark2 3 months ago
I have to get EMPs. Machines are coming.
WarPig15 4 months ago