Global Warming

A short film for my project. I used multiple things for it.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Global
• Warming
• dragonofhope

[JESSEBUBBU]

hey james i find this very...very...whats the word...o yea gay

[dragonofhope]

@JESSEBUBBU ass.

[Nightversionn]

@Nigtversionn Still stalking and impersonating me? EXCUSE ME laurelbush (who forced NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC 101 to shut down Global Warming 101 COMMENTS due to his multple account abuse AND HARASSMENT) ALL YOUR COPY ACCOUNTS ARE NEW MINE is 3 years old. Quit impersonating me all over youtube with your global warming DENIER baloney N ‘ii’ ghtversionn Nigh tt versionn Knigh tt vision Nigtversionn Nightver ss ion, Nigh ttt versionn Nightversio m Nightvers l on etc..

[Nigtversionn]

I hope you FAILED your assignment. Becasue you are wrong about pretty much everything LOL.

.

Hurricane Katrina caused by Global warmig mwahahahahaha... was this for a school of retards??

.

Did you know that earth was in an iceage until 1890, and since then temps have only gone up 1 degree? What do you think happens when an iceage finishes? Do temps stay the same?? haha idiot.

.

Stay in school & keep learning kid. Dont believe politicians when they make nature movies, its all about MONEY.

[HarryPottertard]

Can you guess who I am luv

[MissingGWdotcom]

The fact is temperature change natural and the norm as it keeps our environment healthy and is the driving force behind evolution. Without it you would not be here. Like the head of NASA once said who are you to say what the proper temperature is?

[MissingGWdotcom]

Really I am wondering what part of the science convinces you man made global warming is a fact, because you are just repeating the same old BS? The typical answer 99% of the time is well all scientists say it is true but for one this not true like RM Carter who is one of many that disagrees and has published an excellent paper in an easy to read format going through all the science and issues. Search for R M Carter paper entitled Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate.

[MissingGWdotcom]

Note: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus

[MissingGWdotcom]

There is no direct proof an increase of 100 ppm in CO2 has any effect on temp. Fact is an increase of 100 ppm CO2 has a no effect on temperature in the lab, none! You need to increase CO2 to about 200,000 ppm to see a 3 degree C change. Global warming nuts then say, well the lab is not fair because CO2 is 50,000 feet of atmosphere. So there are some theories based on an idea of layers in 50,000 feet that tries to prove a 100ppm increase in CO2 increase temperature a few tenths of one degree F.

[MissingGWdotcom]

This is an insignificant increase much less proof of man made global warming so the global warming nuts say well CO2 has an amplifying effect and then they rely on flawed global warming models which are grossly positive lookback biased so of course they are going to show an amplifying effect from a small amount of CO2 as they are built to do this but note flawed models are not proof much less science.