Prop 8 in plain English (and not at all biased...so they say)

Apparently some people don't believe in free speech. I do. So here is a video I found on YouTube originally titled "Prop 8 in Plain English". (The part in parenthesis is my attempt at sarcasm) I found this video to be completely one sided and wrong. Upon commenting (very politely I might add) upon the original video, my comments were blocked given that they were arguing some of the issues discussed in this video. So I re-posted it... only this time, all the commenting is enabled...
This IS an issue of rights equality. Please vote NO on Prop 8.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Prop8
• Prop
• Proposition
• in
• plain
• english
• no
• yes

[hagi171]

This is totally biased, I dont care what you say.

[etherfreeze]

yawn. almost fell asleep watching this rubbish.

republicans really suck at making videos. I guess the Bible doesn't teach you much about advertisement.

[macrent2]

Just more bigotry!

[hersheykiss1001]

Really??? All the same rights?? What about the right to marry? The leagel benefit that come with that? They dont have it now, thanks to all those who voted yes... Why would you do that?

[Hidframe]

This video made more sense then any argument i ever heard on this subject. Great job!

[ABGAN100]

@Sh0nin Ok so you have half a brain,tho you should consider taking your own advice. and if I were writing for a national publication, and not on some random blog on YouTube, I would take more care in my writing, but given the lack of general education displayed by persons like your self on this blog, I did not feel the need to watch my grammar, or spelling. especially with some one who would use the phrase "you miserable straw-man-making cunt".

[Sh0nin]

@ABGAN100 Excuse me, but word your comment in clear, grammatically sound and legible language, because I won't be bothered deciphering it as I would the rantings of downs syndrome d-student with an attitude problem. Your ironic insult was duly noted, though. Bravo.

[Sh0nin]

@ABGAN100 Your dear Alan Weiss apparently used the word substitute, whereas I clearly used it punctuate. Also, nothing I said could even come close to being misconstrued as an ad hominem, so I suggest you actually take the time to study fallacies before you try to invoke them in an argument, you misguided pseudo-intellectual fuckwit.

Attempting to gainsay the moral or intellectual highground because of blue language is pathetic and the sign of a truly weak, self-righteous mind.

[ABGAN100]

@Sh0nin "Profanity in a debate—especially in an ad hominem attack on the other person—is a poor substitute for intellect. It denotes a paucity of intelligence, of reasoning power, of wit" Alan Weiss in simpler terms those who can not debate intelligently curse use profanity's, colorful metaphors..bad language. the crutch of the idiots.

[ABGAN100]

@Sh0nin you said it was establishing a law respecting a religion! sense marriage is not a religion any laws that govern marriage would not fall government shall make not law respecting a religion.it is you who has a general lack of understanding! and hear ((((in the US we have freedom of speech you don't have to respond,if your do not want to and their for it is you who is wasting your time! not me!"))) of course if you had even half a brain you would have realized that.

[Sh0nin]

@ABGAN100 Your balking of the issue and general lack of understanding are vexxing me greatly. I could give a fuck whether you want to label it mediation, criminal or festival, whatever asinine twist you wish to put on it, it does not enter into the legality of the matter. Don't waste my time.

I never said it was a religion, you miserable straw-man-making cunt. This conversation isn't going anywhere because you insist on going around in circles. I'm done with you.