Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Concord cop: Stop videotaping (keywords: journalists, reporters)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,548
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 5, 2009

Sponsor: http://CDEvolution.org - North Koreans aren't the only bureaucrats who dislike indie videography. Here's an encounter with camera shy cop near the Holiday Inn on Concord New Hampshire's Main Street.

How you can commission an ad here on the Ridley Report:
http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=15218.0

Euna Lee and Laura Ling little big brother , roxana saberi, freedom of the press media independent indie lou dobbs cops police traffic stop detained cnn right to record
ridleyreport officer concord new hampshire copwatch ron paul checkpoint u.s.a. suspicionless checkpoints free state project liberty libertarian dave ridley report first amendment jailed journalists reporters imprisoned prison court north korea on the job means on the record freed reporters kim jong-il bill clinton

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • No reasonable expectation of privacy. You are free to record (video and audio), no need to get consent.

    The same concept that permits police to put cameras on streets and in their police cars (without our consent) is the same thing that guarantees your right to record them (without their consent).

    Why do police feel they can record us yet we can't record them? How did we allow that to become commonplace?

  • Like cockroaches when a light is turned on.

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ok i recently graduated from law school and ill sum this up for you.. Anyone is allowed to record in a public area, and you do not need any consent because anyone being recorded is a public representative. If a cop says you cannot specifically record him/her, then they are wrong because you have the right to. You have this right because you pay for their salaries and they serve you, so you have the right to record them doing their job since you paid for it.

  • do u come to concord ofton?

  • "The First Circuit Court of Appeals reached a crucial decision last Friday (August 26, 2011) allowing the public to videotape police officers while they're on the clock" dailytech(DOT)com/First+Circui­­­­t+Court+of+Appeals+Rules+th­a­t­+­Citizens+Can+Videotape+P­ol­ic­e/­article22587.htm

  • @diggingforgold The answer is liberalism. Liberalism generates the exact opposite of its stated intent. Whatever they try to make people safe, they actually make people less safe.

  • Police work for a privite Corporation called goverment, this is who they serve & protect. they're training is much different now...they look at the public as the enemy. when the time is right they will jump us all and lock us up for the Corporation. they are here too keep the slaves in line until the time is right ! they are a Privite Army for hire to do the work for the NWO .

  • I don't get the point of this video...Please elaborate. I watched the entire video, but all I saw was the videotaping of a cop getting in his car, leaving, and you talking the entire time.

  • I am fascinated at how ignorant most cops are. Certainly no scientists on the force.

  • any cop who refuses to identify himself when asked should be immediately suspended, what the fuck is this state coming to

  • this dude, kinda looks like dwite schrute from the office

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more