Re: Anarcho-Capitalism Will NOT Work
Uploader Comments (Dabba23)
Top Comments
-
The question of practicality is irrelevant. We have a higher calling to what is right, rather than what we think is more practical. The state is irrefutably immoral, a voluntary society is the only moral choice.
All Comments (108)
-
@NocheezRecords - Ugh, the Nocheez dude again, Mr Ron Neuhauser A.k.A "Ron NeuBrowser" You really dont have no life or friends, stop crying about a system that will never change and get a job. You havent worked in over 10 years. Your a 50 year old loser thats sits home at 3:00 in the morning browsing the net while my sister works her ass off taking care of you and her house. Im posting this on my facebook so my family could see your scams
-
I think the fact is wealth equals power in a capitalist system and since it will be unequal business will be the tyrannical institution. And they most certainly will hire militant thugs to do their bidding. You may be correct that they may not get as large without state protection but they will be tyrannical. Wealth influences markets, The whole idea of capitalism is greed, dog eat dog. I really can't abide by thinking that will lead to good.
-
@Leftovervictim1991 That's incorrect because traditional anarchism is not capitalist.
-
Anarcho-communism is an oxymoron. Capitalism is the Only economic system in which True Anarchy could ever take place "Free market"
-
anarchy is clsoer to communism rather than capitalism. both oppose the state-ism
communism=anarchy
-
@Dabba23 Yeah, you do have a pretty good voice!
What a great voice!
IndividualAutonomy 11 months ago
@IndividualAutonomy What a sweet gentleman you are! Bless you, sir.
Dabba23 11 months ago
I guess you proved your point well. nomoresunsets closed their account.
Hogbeast6 1 year ago
@Hogbeast6 Ha, yeah I still have no clue why she did that. She was in the middle of a video series I think, and then all of a sudden, POOF! Gone.
Dabba23 1 year ago
6:04-6:28
What you said there is a red herring. You could say the same thing about slavery. You could say that proponents of slavery were more tolerant, since they were okay with people *not* owning slaves if they chose not to, whereas anti-slavery proponents were *not* okay with people owning slaves, and wanted to *force* slave owners to free their slaves.
Anarchists think that capitalism is immoral, like slavery, hence their intolerance for it.
Thesterness 1 year ago
@Thesterness My argument is not based on morality. It is based on the idea that anti-statism is more efficient than other forms of governance. Of course, anarchists could still appeal to my preferences (such as the fact that I do, in fact, not like slavery).
Dabba23 1 year ago