damnn i'm not saying there is no difference but it's no really much like 10MP and 20MP and of course the image is sharper so let's both shut up cause we are spamming
I'm comparing two point and shoots together over MP. That was your point. You can't tell the difference between MP. And the same goes for SLR. You can easily see a difference between something like a 10MP and a 20MP. If you really don't think so, just go look at some full size examples. You don't seem to know much about what you're talking about. The more pixels, the sharper and clearer the image. It's a fact. Higher MP, better picture in terms of how clear it is, unless the camera itself sucks
Yes, I do believe a lot of them use auto mode. At least lousy paparazzi folks. And you say pre-set but conditions are always different and if you are trying to take perfect shots, you would always be checking your settings, your exposure, your focus. This camera is for photographers. Not reporters. And I've never had a problem taking macro shots without a display like that. And the negative is it doesn't make an SLR an SLR. Don't need it.
Okay, you think reports and papparzzi use auto-mode? No, they usually have pre-set manual modes, not necessarily having to fiddle with the setting while taking a photo. another scenario for you, taking a macro shot of a flower or a bug.. Bottom line, it definitely is a plus to the camera, what negatives does it have, it only have positive aspects. you might be increasing weight by a few gram at the most. and sacrificing nothing.
Trust me, you're not seeing it right. There is a huge difference. And it doesn't just go for DSLRs. I have a 6mp point and shoot here. It's nice. But then I had a cheaper model 10mp point and shoot. The 10mp shots were crisper and clearer than the 6 without a doubt. Far better. And that's only a 4mp difference. So yes, there is a big difference and you should think about that more. 4mp difference = 4 million more pixels. 4 million more!
Reviewing a camera with 1080, but quality is only 240p
legoliker7517 8 months ago
LOL i know man i have two cameras but let's not talk about this anymore
lorikzzz 2 years ago
I agree. Let's just put it to an end. But I would recommend doing some research for yourself to see.
alliandsean 2 years ago
damnn i'm not saying there is no difference but it's no really much like 10MP and 20MP and of course the image is sharper so let's both shut up cause we are spamming
lorikzzz 2 years ago
I'm comparing two point and shoots together over MP. That was your point. You can't tell the difference between MP. And the same goes for SLR. You can easily see a difference between something like a 10MP and a 20MP. If you really don't think so, just go look at some full size examples. You don't seem to know much about what you're talking about. The more pixels, the sharper and clearer the image. It's a fact. Higher MP, better picture in terms of how clear it is, unless the camera itself sucks
alliandsean 2 years ago
you shouldn't compare it with point and shoots because DSLRs have much bigger sensors then point and shoot cameras
lorikzzz 2 years ago
Yes, I do believe a lot of them use auto mode. At least lousy paparazzi folks. And you say pre-set but conditions are always different and if you are trying to take perfect shots, you would always be checking your settings, your exposure, your focus. This camera is for photographers. Not reporters. And I've never had a problem taking macro shots without a display like that. And the negative is it doesn't make an SLR an SLR. Don't need it.
alliandsean 2 years ago
Okay, you think reports and papparzzi use auto-mode? No, they usually have pre-set manual modes, not necessarily having to fiddle with the setting while taking a photo. another scenario for you, taking a macro shot of a flower or a bug.. Bottom line, it definitely is a plus to the camera, what negatives does it have, it only have positive aspects. you might be increasing weight by a few gram at the most. and sacrificing nothing.
LTF85199 2 years ago
Trust me, you're not seeing it right. There is a huge difference. And it doesn't just go for DSLRs. I have a 6mp point and shoot here. It's nice. But then I had a cheaper model 10mp point and shoot. The 10mp shots were crisper and clearer than the 6 without a doubt. Far better. And that's only a 4mp difference. So yes, there is a big difference and you should think about that more. 4mp difference = 4 million more pixels. 4 million more!
alliandsean 2 years ago
I can tell the difference but it's not a huge difference,but there is no difference for people that don't use DSLRs like my classmates
lorikzzz 2 years ago