Creation Science Radio Gets a Call

I call creation science radio. Waiting on their 'expert'. Hard to do much when theyre not batshit crazy, and defer on every point. That being said, I told you all Id post it, so here it is. We'll get em next week :P

Re: the end, there was a good 2 seconds more of stammering, then he pretty much added filler, the subject changed briefly to theistic evolution, and the call ended (too much 'Im not an expert'). They were very polite, and asked me to call back next week. Nothing interesting happened after, so Im keeping it at what it is :)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• evolution

[gregrutz]

Oh shit ! It's a real Biologist ! Quick hang-up ! Too late, I will just ramble my way out of this.

[M3t4lManiac]

Yes the most prominent scientist 50-500 years ago were Christians, so what? They only helped developed a testable method to determine what is reality, it has no bearing on religion, what we find however, is that the things we have determined by science to be reality completely contradicts these thousands of years old myths. Who would have thought?

[SonOfNye]

If that last moment wasn't and "owned" moment, I don't know what is.

[d007ization]

Like most creationists, claiming a single scientific discovery in a field means the entire field becomes uncertain.

[bloodties1]

Biologist--"I think you are confusing evolution with atheism..."

Creationist moron--"uh...wha..."

[5tonyvvvv]

@csnowutube LOL. Good luck on arguing some thing you have ZERO knowledge on!! Go learn Chirality MORON!!

[csnowutube]

@5tonyvvvv Let's see, looking into your intellectual tool box, we see, copy and paste, distortion of others words, and ad hominem. I guess we're through here. Let me know if you would like to discuss something honestly and without the shouting all caps and double exclamation points.

[5tonyvvvv]

@csnowutube LOL. You show your IGNORANCE WELL!! You have no clue what Homochirality is MORON!!

[csnowutube]

@5tonyvvvv It makes two great differences. One, leaving out "Nearly all" distorts the meaning of the words, and two, by not giving the source, you are showing that you have no trouble being dishonest as you flail about trying to make your point. Poor showing.

[5tonyvvvv]

@csnowutube LOL..What difference does it make, I was giving you a definition, because you have no clue what Homochirality is! dummy!!

[csnowutube]

@5tonyvvvv When you quote someone else, it is considered polite to use quote marks. I.E.: from -

ht creation.com/origin-of-life-th­e-chirality-problem  " Nearly all biological polymers must be homochiral (all its component monomers having the same handedness. Another term used is optically pure or 100 % optically active) to function. All amino acids in proteins are ‘left-handed’, while all sugars in DNA and RNA, and in the metabolic pathways, are ‘right-handed’."

You left off "Nearly..."