of course i know better. i always do ;) physically a redbook-standard cd is superior to a vinylrecord. and both are made from the same master. so the ripped wav is better too. if you get the 192kHz/24bit master, its the best you can get. but i doubt that you could hear the difference on an average good soundsystem. BUT due to the vinylmastering you will hear a difference between the final vinyl and the master. the vinyl might sound better for you, but thats a personal preference and not a fact.
I didnt mean to say that a ripped wav is lossy, just that a CD's quality is limited.. wavs are only of good quality if source is the original mastertape.
But I see you know that, prolly better than me too ^^
compression of the digital file and mastering for the vinyl (well mastering is always important)
for making a vinylcopy the mastertape needs to be specialy remasterd. if the engineer makes a bad job, the vinyl is inferior to the cd or mp3. and both, the vinyl and the cd/mp3 are made from the same DIGITAL mastertape.
besides: if you rip a track from cd to wav, it is exactly the same as on cd. no difference.
BrainButtBeats... you're so silly. I'd take it off but your girlfriend loves it... Lol
djmichaeltoast 1 year ago
tell the dj to stop wearing eye make up.
BrainwashBeats 1 year ago
2:16 BEST & true
masarulez 2 years ago
evermore - its too late (dirty south remix)
PimperJack 2 years ago
wooooooow and I thought I was the only dj that had this PROBLEM....
djchillwill12 2 years ago
thanks for all the love and support
DjMT
djmichaeltoast 2 years ago
all three of you shut up! this is the dumbest pile of shit i have seen on you tube. and phil that song is shit.. pure garbage.. let it go..
SubjektAudio 2 years ago
of course i know better. i always do ;) physically a redbook-standard cd is superior to a vinylrecord. and both are made from the same master. so the ripped wav is better too. if you get the 192kHz/24bit master, its the best you can get. but i doubt that you could hear the difference on an average good soundsystem. BUT due to the vinylmastering you will hear a difference between the final vinyl and the master. the vinyl might sound better for you, but thats a personal preference and not a fact.
HiggsLivinstone 2 years ago
I didnt mean to say that a ripped wav is lossy, just that a CD's quality is limited.. wavs are only of good quality if source is the original mastertape.
But I see you know that, prolly better than me too ^^
eangelos89 2 years ago
it depends on two things:
compression of the digital file and mastering for the vinyl (well mastering is always important)
for making a vinylcopy the mastertape needs to be specialy remasterd. if the engineer makes a bad job, the vinyl is inferior to the cd or mp3. and both, the vinyl and the cd/mp3 are made from the same DIGITAL mastertape.
besides: if you rip a track from cd to wav, it is exactly the same as on cd. no difference.
HiggsLivinstone 2 years ago