DS9 - Science and Religion in the classroom - Part 1

Part 1 of my edited version of the DS9 Episode "In the Hands of the Prophets"

This video is for review or criticism and satire only.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• science
• religion
• classroom
• DS9
• star trek
• creationism
• evolution

[STEJTHEGREATEST]

*Puts on darts announcer's voice* One hundred and eightyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!! ;*O

[AndrewBCNZ]

@STEJTHEGREATEST Hmmm... I can't have brought any hatred to this thread because I don't feel any hate, I've been a bit shocked by some of what you've said but that isn't hatred. Not in the same way that your immediate accusation that atheists are immoral show a degree a hatred, or at least the assumption of superiority that so frequently goes along with hatred.

I think calling somebody "an immoral savage of a human being" is a bit stronger than criticising immature nicknames

[STEJTHEGREATEST]

@AndrewBCNZ If Dawkins' is willing to put his grandkids through extensive bullying, and mental trauma just because he's a selfish, bitter old loser, who wants to continue to grind his ax with religion, then that reveals to me what a self-centred, narrow-minded, nasty little cretinous reject he is.

Dorky Ricky Dorkins isn't sharp-minded, his mind is just clouded with blind hate, and he's mad that he's never been able to attract a loving person to him.

[STEJTHEGREATEST]

@AndrewBCNZ Dorky Ricky Dorkins' grandkids are going to be bullied because the universe attracts things to people that are similar to them, in some way, and if people don't like anything about other people, the universe will try to separate them. If for some reason it doesn't, then things can get ugly. Religious people want to be with people who share the same state of enlightenment that they have, which is why most of them won't give you vindictive atheists the time of day.

[STEJTHEGREATEST]

@AndrewBCNZ If Dorky Ricky Dorkins has so much evidence like you think he does, then why didn't he go to Liberty University to prove without doubt that their dinosaur fossil is an age consistent with his own fossils? Instead, he just libellously slandered them, and seemed to try and force himself to forget that they have the fossil, like maybe he's scared that someone will look more deeply into the matter, and expose him as a liar and a fraud!!!! ;*(

[AndrewBCNZ]

@STEJTHEGREATEST Indeed, how dare he use his sharp mind to point out the truth about religion. A capital offence.

Sorry for the slow reply, I was too busy taking a variety of drugs, sacrificing babies and whatever else you seem to think atheists do in their spare time (I was at uni and studying, mostly).

[STEJTHEGREATEST]

@AndrewBCNZ According to Charlie Darlose's definition of evolution, it happens over tens of thousands of years!!!! No one could have possibly witnessed it, therefore scientists claiming to have witnessed it in their lifetime only tarnishes the theory, and makes it seem all the more irrational, seeing as how no one can agree about the rate at which it happens!!!

God's powers aren't magical, they're perfectly natural, coming from an omnipotent being, like he is.

[AndrewBCNZ]

@STEJTHEGREATEST I would instead say that if his grandkids are going to be bullied because he's an atheist, it just proves my point about religious people being the hateful ones more often than atheists.

What it proves to me is that Dawkins cares more about the truth than about his popularity. I don't think it's his responsibility to start lying to placate angry religious nuts, and if his grandkids are bullied for it than that's the bullies' fault, not Dawkins.

[AndrewBCNZ]

@STEJTHEGREATEST Dawkins' arguments on evolution are based on years of research and on facts. The are therefore consistent, by definition the only way his arguments CAN be inconsistent is in which pieces of evidence he emphasises, and that's hardly a weakness.

He doesn't write about evolution in order to make money out of it, he could make more money if he changed his mind and started spouting religious rubbish, but that would be compromising the truth: something good scientists don't do.

[STEJTHEGREATEST]

@AndrewBCNZ What, I'm hateful when you call me a 5 year old for bringing humour into intense debates with funny nicknames????????!!!!! You can call Christians hateful all you want, but the sheer amount of hatred you've brought to this thread, and even your latest replies, is undeniable. It's clear that you just can't stop yourself, and that you're an immoral savage of a human being!!!! ;*(