IRAN MILITARY WILL DESTROY U.S.A. NAVY 5TH FLEET WITH PERSIAN GULF ANTISHIP BLLISTIC MISSILE

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
26,621
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 30, 2011

World War III: The Launching of a Preemptive Nuclear War against Iran

by Michel Chossudovsky --------------- http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28026 -------------- The launching of an outright war using nuclear warheads against Iran has been on the active drawing board of the Pentagon since 2005.

If such a war were to be launched, the entire Middle East Central Asia region would flare up. Humanity would be precipitated into a World War III Scenario.

World War III is not front-page news. The mainstream media has excluded in-depth analysis and debate on the implications of these war plans.

The onslaught of World War III, were it to be carried out, would be casually described as a "no-fly zone", an operation under NATO's "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P) with minimal "collateral damage" or a "limited" punitive bombing against specific military targets, all of which purport to support "Global Security" as well as "democracy" and human rights in the targeted country.

Public opinion is largely unaware of the grave implications of these war plans, which contemplate the use of nuclear weapons, ironically in retaliation to Iran's nonexistent nuclear weapons program.

Moreover, 21st Century military technology is at an advanced stage of development combining an array of sophisticated weapons systems.




We are at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in World history.

The future of humanity is at stake.

The present situation is one of advanced war planning by a formidable military force using nuclear warheads.

The Pentagon's global military design is one of world conquest.

The military deployment of US-NATO forces is occurring in several regions of the World simultaneously.

Militarization at the global level is instrumented through the US military's Unified Command structure: the entire planet is divided up into geographic Combatant Commands under the control of the Pentagon. According to (former) NATO Commander General Wesley Clark, the Pentagon's military road-map consists of a sequence of war theaters: "[The] five-year campaign plan [includes]... a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan."

Military action is waged in the name of the "Global War on Terrorism" and Global Security. It has a stated "humanitarian" "pro-democracy" mandate.

It is predicated on the notion that the West's arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons are (in contrast to those [nonexistent] of the Islamic Republic), according to expert scientific opinion on contract to the Pentagon, "harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion is underground."

Irresponsible politicians are unaware of the implications of their actions. They believe their own war propaganda: nuclear weapons are heralded as an instrument of peace and democracy.

War is heralded as a peace-keeping making operation carried out with the support of the "international community".

The victims of war are described as the perpetrators. Iran and Syria constitute a threat to Global Security thereby justifying pre-emptive military action.

Global Warfare

The concept of the "Long War" has characterised US military doctrine since the end of World War II.

The broader objective of global military dominance in support of an imperial project was first formulated under the Truman administration in the late 1940s at the outset of the Cold War.

We are dealing with a global military agenda, namely "Global Warfare". The 2000 Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which was the backbone of the NeoCon's agenda was predicated on "waging a war without borders".

  • likes, 91 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (532)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @killzone2000 must be a game Obama got a peace prize for nothing but being himself.

  • @killzone2000 That is my entire point. We would like the great persion, (Iranian) people to rise up and get rid of these ignorant Mullahs. You bravely tried it a few years ago, and the rest of the world was cheering for you. You can do it again. You are a great people. War with the USA is pointless. But bringing your country into the 21st century will bring you greatness again.

  • The main force of the battle of Thermopylae was ordered to leave by Leoneans because they were betrayed. Yet this little force killed thousands of Persians before they were finally overwhelmed by the barbarians. Athens was purposely abandoned as a strategic measure. In the end, the entire invading Persian Army was destroyed in Greece, as it will be destroyed by the US in the future. This all not the point. The point is that we do not want to see this happen.

  • @agrover99 what game? winning a nobel peace prize is not a game you fucking fool...

  • @Ninjass4Life more bullshit estimate huh 20,000 ahaha no the highest estimates of how many greeks present was a little over 10,000... there was 300 spartans present at the battle along with a couple hundred supporting helots. the other greeks also played a role but ultimately the spartans stayed behind as a delaying action.

  • @Ninjass4Life YOU are a fucking retard HAHAHA SO MANY POSTS OF IGNORANCE AND HISTORY CHANGE. FIRST OFF THE PERSIAN ARMY GOT DESTROYED SHORTLY AFTER the battle of Thermopylae at the battle of plataea. the persian navy also got annihilated at the battle of salamis before that. ALEXANDER didnt die in battle... he died of an illness after his army refused to go any further in india he returned back west and fell ill.

  • @Ninjass4Life who cares if you haven't started a war in 300 years. thats doesnt make you a peaceful nation.

  • But even though look at Iran now and look at bankrupt Greece they got massacred by the Ottomans while we defeated the Ottomans. Empires come and go but Persian always stays. And for Roman documentary search "PERSIAN EMPIRE AND DEFEAT OF ROME" here on youtube.

    Also sense you are ignorant I tell you, the Mullahs hate Persian history when it was post Islamic era and never talk about it.

    And Iran barely ever starts wars we haven't started a war in 300 years.

  • @tazoz626 And the book describes how the Greeks main army ran while this smaller force stayed and hid in a mountain pass where after three days they where all slain and The Persian army moves to Athens and according to Herodutus burns down much of Athen and all the cities in their path. However it is true that Alexander conquered Persian many years after this but He died shortly after got injured and died in a battle between what is today the border of Pakistan and India.

  • @tazoz626 "The Battle of Thermopylae, a smaller force of Greek warriors led by King Leonidas of Sparta resisted the much larger Persian forces, but were ultimately defeated. True estimations fall between 150,000-300,000 Persian soldiers and around 20,000-50,000 Greeks and Athenians. As written in the book of Thermopylae: The Battle For The West by:Ernle Bradford. I mean even this book I read only shows western point of view so its biased but 300 lol what joke.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more