Review for Renault-Nissan alliance

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
970 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Feb 28, 2011

Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn bows to Renault shareholder dissatisfaction, says Renault-Nissan alliance's capital structure to be reviewed within 3 years.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • As long as the car looks nice, has the bells and whistles, the quick/ powerful engine, their hope is most people will not even research a make/ model's reliability history to confirm its reliability excellence. But Renault used Nissan's reputation to fool people into believing that their newer cars, while more attractive, were just as good if not better in the reliability dept, as their predecessors. THEY WEREN'T. Maxima's, Pathfinder's , Altima's, ALL TOOK A TUMBLE. It began to surface that t

  • @rev7verse9 unfortunately, "Car of the Year" does not take into account, longevity, breakdowns, reliability, and repairs. If u want the best of the bes with regards reliability, stick with Honda, Toyota, Subaru, Scion, Lexus, and Acura. Nissan's, like Renault's, are designed to fall apart after the bumper-to- bumper warranty. Like Nissan's VP of Product Marketing said, they don't want to "over-engineer" their cars. Their banking that people r stupid enough to trade in their junk for newer

  • If consumer's lid just be more deligint and not reward Nissan by buying their lower quality cars, Nissan would be forced to improve. It amazes me how companies like Renault, can fool the public over and over again, by drawing them in to buy their cars DESPITE THEIR WELL KNOWN ISSUES IN THE RELIABILITY DEPT. Stop it people, speak with ur dollars! If ur gonna spen $20,000+ on a car make sure it's got a proven track record of lasting 20+ years of durability, and reliability. It helps resale va

  • Nissans after 1999 have the Renault influence of cheaper parts, lower quality,, higher failure rate.

  • Renault has the WORST reliability in the industry. The left the US market because of reliability issues being realized by consumers. Now they're back but this time under the Nissan' brand. They have brought down Nissan's reliability as a whole. Nissan's no longer hold up like they use to. They''re junk after 4 years and so e are junk from the beginning. U can thank Renault for that. Stick with Toyota and Honda.

  • Renault KILLED Nissan. Nissan does not produce solid quality vehicles anymore, like they used to do (what a wonderful heritage they left with the old Pickup D21, Patrol, Teranno I & II). Their cars now are made just by Renault Recipe: Cheap car, cheap materials, shabby quality, HUGE prices for spare part and maintenance.

    It seems to me that the French came, took advantage of Nissan reputation, in exchange letting them to tinkle freely on their GT-R. That's it. Nissan in my opinion is DEAD. RIP

  • he talks like cesar milan from the dog whisperer

  • Nissan is better ! ! !

  • lol more shareholders = worse cars look at GM.

  • @leepakim

    Let's not exaggerate.

    The Nissan 370z is a pretty decent car for example.

    And there are some Renault models that aren't bad either.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more