Heads/Cam LS1 vs. Heads/Cam 351W Foxbody

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
158,190
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 3, 2008

Mods in vid, Enjoy

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Snizzy2)

  • WOW another Fucked Over Rebuilt Dodge with a built engine picking on a Z28 with mild mods What a puss

  • @Mommytologanplus1 Wow, another butthurt Bowtie nuthugger that is completely oblivious to the fact the heads on the ford flow less than stock LS1 heads.. BUILT engine, my ass.. Stock block, crank, rods... And your "mildy" modded 'Maro hads Heads and cam. I would love to see even an LS3 2010+ maro run 11.44@121.5 like this "mild" maro did. Check vid at bottom. This couldn't possibly been more of a fair run.

  • what kind of tranny did you use for the 351w?

  • @mariol1990

    Tremec TKO.. it was weathered and wouldn't shift above 6400rpms.. which is why 3-4 I would pill the car trying to get around the maro, and it wouldn't go in.

  • @Snizzy2 What kind of head u got on your 351w ?? I want a good set but I dont know if 2.02 valve with fit with stock piston and all that.. I Have a e303 with .496 I think and do u think it will fit ?

  • @AlexCoC3

    You should be fine. I run Windsor Senior Iron Heads, with the 2.02I valves, and have .608 lift on intake side.. no problems even with 10.75:1 compression.. As long as you have the 87-93 motor you should be fine.. I think the 86's had clearance issues with aftermarket setups

Top Comments

  • @stylinwiley

    Any mustang with a worn tremec 5 spd becomes increasing more difficult to shift hard above 6500rpms. Most normal mustang owners even with basic H/C dont go above that rpm. In these races I was pilling the car in 3rd to around 6800rpms before shifting to try and distance myself and take advantage of the long gears, as opposed to shifting 1-2 and 2-3 @ under 6500rpms. The transmission would NOT SHIFT NO MATTER WHOSE STICKY INTERNET FINGERS THINK THEY COULD OF DONE DIFFERENT!

see all

All Comments (892)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Mommytologanplus1 Any response to Mommytologanplus' comment?? Couldn't have fucking said it better myself. Go cry to momma...

  • I did this same race last night but with the 80's Z28! Sorry to say the camaro did last too long HAHA. and i was even behind him got around him and still pulled like a bitch on it! Beat a semi built LT-1 already too.

  • Nice video, one of the better ones on youtube. Fan of both cars, nice to see you guys giving them hell!

  • @Snizzy2 This is just a question, I am not trying to say I could do it better. Would double clutching the 3-4 shift help any? I know in a race situation you are looking for a very fast shift. But my thought is either a double clutch, or a slip it out of third without the clutch then clutch it into 4th?? of course either method you wld b waiting on engine rpm to drop down, and that does take time.. just my thoughts.. Nice stang!!

  • 351w... the reason why Ford should've never went OHC. Imagine how good their pushrod motors would've been by now. I consider the 351w the LT1 of Ford, wish Ford would've kept the pushrod design long enough to see the LS1 of Ford motors, would've been great, screw OHC.

  • THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF A GOOD FUKING RACE!!! BOTH CARS ARE NECK AT NECK GOOD JOB BRO!! I WANNA 5.0 NOW!!

  • @Snizzy2 thx alot Yes I have the 87 f350 engine.. I will see what I can do

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more