Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

V-22 vmm-263 in Iraq

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,763
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 29, 2008

taking off from lz in Iraq

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @09011994 Yeah man, a gunship version would be interesting.

  • @kicknbazz1615 haha, plus theyre not really meant to be troop killers. theyre really more for cover fire and support. and youd have to hunch down to use a sight cus of how low its mounted

  • @orlock20 yeah, pretty sure its just a precaution. they really havent turned these into warbirds yet. theyre still only used for troop transport and this is about as armed as they get. i really wish theyd expand on the design.

  • Go Thunderchickens! Carrying on the PROUD tradition of the CH-46 crews that flew in Vietnam. From the proud son of a US Army Aviator that flew 'Slicks' in Vietnam, '65-'66.

  • Eventually they will give these osprey some Littlebird or Firescout drones to command aswell.

    They currently use the Littlebird drones as targeting and recon for the apache longbow which acts as a control center and can use the little bird's target lock to fire from the apache and hit targets from out of range of sight attacks

  • A British weapons company has a side gunner weapon system in where the gunner has a telescopic sight system and FLIR built into the helmet. It's a weight/cost issue vs accuracy. My guess is that the gunner's job is to lay down cover fire for those entering and exiting the aircraft. It looks like a bad set up for air to ground operations so I don't think that's the use for this system.

  • @dmcfarli Well there doing just fine without all that stuff.

  • @kicknbazz1615

    "More room and space" ? Looks pretty spacious to me.

    For a mounted heavy MG, a scope makes complete sense; the recoil for the 7.62mm NATO is totally manageable from the 240 especially when it's mounted.

  • @dmcfarli No they don't. a shield would just take up more room and space.

    A telescopic sight on a M240 or any heavy MG is pointless. You wouldnt be able to stay on target with a scope.

  • Yeah I've always wondered why they haven't armed this thing with pilot/co-pilot controlled weaponry. They could easily mount a minigun under the cockpit. I would think anyway. It doesn't seem like the weight would be a problem ether. Its kind of strange.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more