Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Bruckner Symphony No.8 - Finale (3/3), Giulini

Carlo Maria Giulini: Conductor World Philharmonic Orchestra Finale: Feierlich, nicht schnell  
 
Customize

More From: MahaKrisna

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

70 ratings
Sign in to rate
24,342 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (27)   Options

Loading...
telemacohomewwod (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
giulini is incredible ... i love all he do
jepcorp (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Listen to Celibidache's 8th finale on youtube...
Kurkikohtaus (3 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Jebus...
nolanryan999 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
lol...
that was the best comment I've read in sooo long
gdmusicislove (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I agree, Sinfoniahorn. But nevertheless, I personnaly think that Oliver Kahn used to hold his quarter notes sometimes a little bit too short...
wbcred (5 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Chills from 5:17 on ... incredible music ...
Sinfoniahorn (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes really. Just to go by your definition of 140 beats per minute with the final note being a quarter note, which it is in the score, a full length quarter note will not stop sounding until the downbeat of the second beat. This is not a staccato note in the score, and in fact has an accent over it. Set your metronome to 140 and sing a full length quarter note, and it is NOT short, but rather a full tone. Also, there is a ritard the last measure of the work that you clearly missed...
OliverKahnNr1 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
Ritenuto. It is a full note. And according to my music notation programme, this is closer to a full quarter note at quarter note = 60 bpm. Just saying. Why not take it down to quarter note = 40 bpm? I didn't see that this note was a staccato. The staccato-tenuto argument was only for example; not for concrete referencing. Fine, his quarter note is legitimate. So is my taste of the ritenuto not being THAT extreme. BPO is better anway. Do you wish to argue that to full extremes, as well? I'm done.
Sinfoniahorn (5 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Of course I dont wish to argue extremes, but that has been my whole point. You decided to bring out metronome speeds and be scientific about this, which I would consider going to extremes. There are too many critics on youtube who feel they are smarter than the conductors actually on the podium. People should be less extreme and just enjoy what these Maestros and orchestras do, not pull out metronomes and be snobs about it. (not just you) So, no extremes, and I am done as well. Thank you.
gdmusicislove (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Yes! Well said!

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.