Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Borg / Laver at Hilton Head

1976 SF action between Bjorn Borg and Rod Laver at the World Invitational Tennis Classic at Hilton Head. Borg would go on to defeat Laver to move on to the final where he disposed of Arthur Ashe. ...  
 
Customize

More From: chapaev36

Loading...

QuickList(0)

32 ratings
Sign in to rate
52,535 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (88)   Options

Loading...
vindo112 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
that's the greatest player of all time?? laver???

looks amateurish compared to now
chapaev36 (1 month ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Based on what? I've never seen an amateur hit a drop volley like that.
Thetoughestweight1 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
..yes, that's the greatest player of all time probably tided by Roger Federer now. He was 38 YEARS OLD here, at that age Borg (one of the greatest of his own) had ritered fromsomething like 11 years, Pete Sampras (my fav ever) plays exibition matches, and Fed will probably be doing the same (with less success)...
spacecated (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
On that note, I wonder if Laver's thinking: "Damn! Does this guy ever miss or get tired?"
spacecated (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
38 year old Laver vs 20 year old Borg. That's an 18 year difference!

Didn't really see Borg pushed too hard in this match. Still Laver manages to keep it respectable.

Wish there was some way to pit the best across generations against each other.

It's matches like these that make you wonder how a 20 year old Laver would fare against a 20 year old Borg.
MisterCrazyLegs (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
now this is REALLY amazing!. You dont often see these matches where Borg played guys from a generation before him...and Laver wasnt far off his best here but he was older and Borg was not the kind of cat you wanted to play if you were even relatively aged. He would run the best of 'em ragged. At least Rocket had sense enuf to come to the net a lot....and he still lost.
mantiskf2003 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You might find it funny that he was the best player in the world, and an Australian; yet here in australia, we were all being coached to use techniques more common to Rosewall or Newcombe - regardless of individual strengths and weaknesses.
The way he waits with the racquet in a more relaxed position; more keeping of the racquet head behind the line of the ball with less obvious "backswing"; backhand contact and follow through more like Federer, on cross court particularly......
mantiskf2003 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
then the rest of the world "discovered" these improvements and accentuated aspects to suit their conditions....and look where Australia is now.
Aside from Hewitt and Phillipoussis, our entire last two generations still played more like Rosewall or Newcombe - Alexander, Dent, Cash, Fitzgerald, Masur, the Woodies.

Fortunately so many of those who played against Laver opened academies and brought on the "latin" and European countries - so his legacy is not lost.
mrbobevans (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I was talking to a local teaching pro who is considered the guru of strokes. I asked him how could Laver hit a continental topspin forehand. He said it was only because of Laver's huge forearm. With my kids, I tried doing it and felt like I was going to break my arm. Amazing strength Laver had.
mantiskf2003 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
you may be  confused with entries to the Aus open in the era after laver - true he didn't come back home after about '71 because of his business in the US

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.