YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Mitt Romney Owned on 2nd Amendment!

scudiac scudiac·4 videos
16
151,624
Like     Dislike 124

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like scudiac's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike scudiac's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add scudiac's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Dec 22, 2007

At a recent Town Hall meeting in Londonderry, New Hampshire, Mitt Romney comes out in favor of backround checks for all gun buyers, The Brady Bill and The Assault Weapons Ban.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • pWnographist

    This is why I didnt vote for him.

    · 5

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate pWnographist's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate pWnographist's comment.
  • StadiumHot
    happened: 1st step, ban most powerful guns. 2nd, registration to monitor who has guns. Next?: 3rd, limit mag capacity/ban some semi-autos. 4th, make army more powerful/more armed. Buy out ammo for authorities. 5th, ban all semis. Regulate/limit all ammo. 6th, admittance that handguns kill more than anything else, so ban those. 7th, all guns illegal. 8th, confiscation - by means of using said powerful army and registration. 9th, war. 10th, drone tactics on own people once those people fight back.
    · 4

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate StadiumHot's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate StadiumHot's comment.

All Comments (3,066)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • InSearchOf SolidGround

    and i have no hope for economic recovery or any "progress" in this nation at least as long as people like G DUB and BO are running things. the only thing we are progressing towards is a socialist society run by a dictator

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate InSearchOf SolidGround's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate InSearchOf SolidGround's comment.
    in reply to kommando81 (Show the comment)
  • InSearchOf SolidGround

    the militia im talking about would be made up of several million combat veterans who are no longer serving. and mountain men who have spent their lives hunting, fishing, camping(not motor home style btw) and definitely know how to shoot. And again i dont want ANY conflicts especially a civil war. but we must stand and fight as our founders did if this regime becomes more and more tyrannical like they are doing everyday. and whats this particular organization you refer to?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate InSearchOf SolidGround's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate InSearchOf SolidGround's comment.
    in reply to kommando81 (Show the comment)
  • aetheldread

    ...Corporatism depends upon regulations and a keynesian economic structure to handicap competition and bypass the will of the marketplace. Keynesianism disincentivizes and decapitalizes competition by rewarding their chosen "winners" with redistribution, eg TARP. It seems like keynesians are always wont to try and equate corporatism with laissez-faire models and downplay corporatism's dependence upon keynesian policy for its tenability.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate aetheldread's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate aetheldread's comment.
    in reply to kommando81 (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later