Interpretively this is far better than Michalangeli , who is too harsh in striking those chords and the pedaling is way too clean for a piece called REFLECTIONS IN THE WATER. his interpretation is a travesty of the impressionism of DEBUSSY
Very nicely played except I wish as much rubato was used in the first pages as in the last 2 pages. There were several missed notes and the biggest thing is the opening chord trios should be tenuto and blend from one to another.
I actually think this one is better than Michelangeli's. His is too clean cut. It's kind of a contradicting reason, but we live in a world where perfect doesn't exist. Anything unbelievably close sounds almost foreign. That's how I'd describe Michelangeli's performance: too perfect.
@cholapat well she can, because she's playing as well as Arturo :)
wrigleyx 10 months ago
Interpretively this is far better than Michalangeli , who is too harsh in striking those chords and the pedaling is way too clean for a piece called REFLECTIONS IN THE WATER. his interpretation is a travesty of the impressionism of DEBUSSY
Jamessemaj12 2 years ago
Very nicely played except I wish as much rubato was used in the first pages as in the last 2 pages. There were several missed notes and the biggest thing is the opening chord trios should be tenuto and blend from one to another.
Jamessemaj12 2 years ago
Because she plays really well and she deserves it.
But, of course, she didn't want to be compared with such a legendary pianist like michelangeli.
cholapat 3 years ago
I actually think this one is better than Michelangeli's. His is too clean cut. It's kind of a contradicting reason, but we live in a world where perfect doesn't exist. Anything unbelievably close sounds almost foreign. That's how I'd describe Michelangeli's performance: too perfect.
This one is just right.
DaKrazedKyubizt 3 years ago 2
A super video, and lovely performance.
PSearPianist 4 years ago
very high performance
panyawut2533 4 years ago