Science: The Emperical Flaw via Technological Limits

It is my opinion that sometimes our scientific observations cannot be trusted. And this is why.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Atheist
• Atheism
• Secular
• Energy
• State
• Atom
• Orbital
• Electron
• Science
• Technology
• Islam
• Judaism
• Christianity

[emfederin]

Richard Feynman, one of the premier quantum physicists, once said "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics".

Scientists aren't stupid. They understand when observations can't be trusted. Quantum entanglement is a classic example. But this is exactly when efforts are redoubled to understand what's happening.

And like your video, there's ALWAYS a rational explanation for what we observe.

BTW, your "theory" isn't a theory; it's a "quick guess".

[Xeromyr]

@emfederin I'm a physicist.

[emfederin]

@Xeromyr "I'm a physicist"

And I'm not. :-)

But I'm curious why you posted this as a response to the WDPLAC video.

I'm afraid this space will soon be overrun by hordes of double-digit IQ fundies using your video as a blanket indictment against science because of its "flaws", and your qualifying "technological limits" will be completely lost on them.

Instead, these mushbrains will interpret your video to mean that since scientists are technologically limited, science is undependable.