Humans and Dinosaurs once lived together!

Street Team: http://www.thinkatheist.com/group/street
http://www.thinkatheist.com
Mobile Version - http://www.thinkatheist.com/m
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/ThinkAtheist
FaceBook - http://www.facebook.com/ThinkAtheist 1. There are no human fossils or artifacts found with dinosaurs, and there are no dinosaur fossils found with human fossils (except birds, which are descended from dinosaurs; out-of-place human traces such as the Paluxy footprints do not withstand examination). Furthermore, there is an approximately sixty-four-million-year gap in the fossil record when there are neither dinosaur nor human fossils. If humans and dinosaurs coexisted, traces of the two should be found in the same time places. At the very least, there should not be such a dramatic separation between them. 2. If dinosaurs and humans were found together, it would not be evidence against evolution.
Via
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH710.html

Category:

Education

Tags:

• science
• questions
• atheist
• atheism
• human
• endeavor
• start
• thinking
• christians
• bible
• political
• god
• sin
• creation
• thomas
• pain

[Bobbiethejean]

That unicorn is an impostor! I know this because he is in fact, visible.

[WeThinkAtheist]

lol!

[sarabellumm]

"less than 10,000 years ago"

Where do you get less than10,000 years ago? The Bible doesn't have dates in it.

[GeeKayKayGee]

And evidence against evolution is not, de facto, evidence for god.

So many creationists, so many lessons to be learned.

[10bhave]

dinosaurs and humans coexist, watch it, cos they did coexist

[SrgGoofy]

@GeeKayKayGee Well, for simplicities sake, we'll use the creationists concept of Macro Evolution, which states that a new Kind can arise from existing Kinds, and that life can spring forth from it's component parts. And we'll call Creation "Intelligent Design" where some entity planned and executed creation.

[GeeKayKayGee]

@GeeKayKayGee

I would argue that perhaps there is a 3rd or 4th or more I would argue that perhaps there is a 3rd or 4th or more alternate possibilities and we must first come to agreement on definitions before exploring the idea of 'this or that'.

[GeeKayKayGee]

@GeeKayKayGee

By 'creation', do you mean creation as is commonly preached by the Abrahamic religions, do you mean creation as told by say the many different indigenous groups of North America, or do you mean creation as ummm... 'out of nothing by some agent or force that is undetectable and unknowable'.?

Were we to argue I might open by claiming that the question need not necessarily be binary, need not be 'it is either this or that'.

[GeeKayKayGee]

@SrgGoofy "So if evolution is proven to be untrue, then creation is verified (though not proven)."

I find it difficult to argue about this claim as I am not well versed in logic, debate, science and theology and as your statement lacks imo, precision. By 'evolution' do you mean currently accepted evolutionary theory as a whole, so called 'Darwinian Evolution' or do you mean a blanket 'no thing, neither biological, mechanical nor intellectual, has ever evolved from that which preceded it.'?

[SrgGoofy]

@GeeKayKayGee If evolution is not true, then what is the alternative? The only other one I can think of is planet seeding, then you have to ask, were the aliens created, or did they evolve. So if evolution is proven to be untrue, then creation is verified (though not proven).

[ebilly99]

@gguessman That doesn't matter one bit. If I only have 20 different perfect legos, and my freind has 20 different legos, But 10 of his are identicle to 10 of mine, it doesn't matter if we they are perfect we got 10 useless legos. In fact mutations are the only thing that lets inbreeding even start to work. (Not that there are not mistakes but without them it is even worse)

[warangel87]

@GregDrayGregDray that one fake fossil is gonna make you ignore the other properly dated using actual proven research fossils found in museums all over the world? REALLY!?!?!?!

[warangel87]

@gguessman actually all genetic variation supposedly comes from noah and his sons and their wives...you know after that flood? Incest....... and the animals did incest too? and then im supposed to believe in light of what I learned from molecular genetics that all animal plant bug and human life we see today reached this level of variation and population from 2500 bc (the actual date of the flood in bible) to now? stop spouting nonsense it hurts my eyes to read >:(